Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 189/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:II.DOR.189.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as inadmissible due to failure to meet statutory review conditions under ZPP.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 189/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the defendant's application for permission to appeal, ruling it inadmissible. The first-instance court had fully awarded damages to the plaintiff against the defendant, a decision upheld by the second-instance court. The Supreme Court determined that the conditions for granting a review under Article 367.a of the Civil Procedure Act were not met, leading to the dismissal of the application.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 367.c, paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act: An application for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting a review are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
permission to appeal review application Civil Procedure Act inadmissible application damages liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367.c, paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 324, paragraph 7 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSC sklep Cp 831/2005
Court allows appeal, remands case for retrial on 40% contributory negligence regarding emergency fire response.
VSL sodba II Cp 1305/99
Court reduces car driver's liability from 90% to 30% due to victim's contributory negligence in a traffic accident case.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 61/2024
Employment agency held liable for worker's injury despite lack of written site notification due to statutory safety duties.
VSL Sodba III Cp 704/2020
Appeal dismissed; public stair defect requiring repair constitutes breach of duty of care despite minor wear.
VSC sodba Cp 1272/2005
Civil court dismisses liability claim for soldier's fall on steep slope due to high danger activity.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je v ponovnem sojenju z vmesno sodbo razsodilo, da je toženka v celoti odškodninsko odgovorna tožniku za škodo, ki jo je utrpel v škodnem dogodku z dne 20. 1. 2012.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo toženke zavrnilo in potrdilo vmesno sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je toženka vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije in v predlogu kot pomembni izpostavila naslednji vprašanji: Ali je odločitev sodišča, da ne upošteva mnenja v postopku postavljenega izvedenca, procesno pravilna in utemeljena? Ali je odločitev sodišča druge stopnje, da je zavarovanec toženke odgovoren za nastalo škodo tožniku, materialnopravno pravilna?

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP predlog tožene stranke zavrnilo.

6. Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).