Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 243/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:II.DOR.243.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request as no significant legal issue is raised.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 243/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicants' request to permit a revision of the second-instance judgment. The lower courts had dismissed claims regarding the invalidity of a loan agreement, mortgage registration, and security agreement. The Supreme Court found that the conditions for allowing a revision under the Code of Civil Procedure were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a(1) and Article 367c(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure; A revision request is inadmissible if the decision does not raise a significant legal issue of importance for legal certainty, uniform application of law, or legal development.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure permission for revision legal certainty uniform application of law dismissal of appeal second instance judgment loan agreement validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 324(7) of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL Sodba I Cpg 124/2018
Contract termination for non-performance requires clear intent that late performance is meaningless under OZ Art. 104.
VSL sklep I Cpg 692/2012
Appeal court vacates first instance judgment on lease invalidity due to erroneous application of property law.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 343/2021
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for review of property dispute judgment regarding usufruct agreement validity.
Sodba II Ips 118/2004
Appeal dismissed; no essential procedural violation found despite alleged contradictions between court findings and documents.
VSRS Sodba III Ips 11/2015
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on short-term loan contract, upholding lower court's rejection of invalidity claims.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog za dopustitev revizije se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za ugotovitev ničnosti posojilne pogodbe in sporazuma o zavarovanju denarne terjatve ter zahtevek za ugotovitev neveljavnosti vknjižene hipoteke in zaznambe neposredne izvršljivosti. Odločilo je o stroških postopka.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožnikov zavrnilo.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje sta tožnika vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Vrhovno sodišče dopusti revizijo, če je od njegove odločitve mogoče pričakovati odločitev o pravnem vprašanju, pomembnem za zagotovitev pravne varnosti, enotne uporabe prava ali za razvoj prava preko sodne prakse (prvi odstavek 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP). 1 Vrhovno sodišče je ugotovilo, da navedeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso podani, zato je predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP). Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).

1 Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 s spremembami in dopolnitvami.