Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 51/2019-9 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.51.2019.9 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application as statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 51/2019-9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought to overturn a lower court ruling that dismissed their claim for damages and awarded legal costs to the defendant. The court denied the request because the specific conditions required by the Civil Procedure Act for granting leave to appeal were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a ZPP; 367.c ZPP: A request for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for admissibility under the Civil Procedure Act are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
permission to appeal Civil Procedure Act admissibility conditions review application second instance judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a ZPP
367.c ZPP
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II Ips 360/2017
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to lawyer's power of attorney dated before the final judgment was received.
VSL Sodba in sklep II Cp 2084/2019
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff's claim rejected as mere absence does not prove liability without proven illegality.
VSL sodba I Cpg 562/2005
Appeal dismissed; court lacks free assessment power when factual value of items is determinable without disproportionate difficulty.
VDSS sodba Pdp 510/2013
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's rejection of judge's pay difference claim due to lack of legal basis.
VSL sodba I Cpg 810/2013
Appeal dismissed; unjust enrichment claim rejected due to lack of proven actual loss in insolvency proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Predlog za dopustitev revizije se zavrne.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek tožeče stranke, da ji je tožena stranka dolžna plačati 5.098,60 EUR s pripadki. Tožeči stranki je naložilo, da toženi stranki plača 1.513,63 EUR pravdnih stroškov.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi drugega odstavka 367.c člena ZPP predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

5. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).