Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 130/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:III.DOR.130.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review to examine if second instance court should have held a hearing.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 130/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the review application regarding whether the second-instance court ought to have conducted a hearing. The second instance court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 4,520 EUR and interest, prompting the plaintiff to file for review. The court ruled that the conditions for review under the Code of Civil Procedure were met for this specific procedural question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 367.a odst. 1; Review is permitted to examine whether the court of second instance should have conducted a hearing in the specific circumstances of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure review admissibility second instance hearing procedural review supreme court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
324. odst. 7 Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
AI generated
Sklep III DoR 59/2011
Supreme Court allows review to determine if OZ public reward rules apply to private partnership contracts.
VSL sodba II Cp 3126/2016
Court dismisses appeal confirming that non-pecuniary damage scope is known when treatment ends and victim stabilizes.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 169/2020
Supreme Court allows review regarding whether a plaintiff must prove their own loss in unjust enrichment claims.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 94/2020
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to unpaid court fee during statutory court holidays.
VSL sklep II Cp 210/2013
Court partially allows appeal, remands case for re-evaluation of contract invalidity and damages.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali bi moralo sodišče druge stopnje v okoliščinah konkretnega primera opraviti pritožbeno obravnavo?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali bi moralo sodišče druge stopnje v okoliščinah konkretnega primera opraviti pritožbeno obravnavo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je v delu, ki je relevanten za odločanje o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, pritožbi ugodilo in prvostopenjsko sodbo spremenilo tako, da je tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 4.520,00 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 9. 12. 2018 naprej zavrnilo.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).