Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 63/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:III.DOR.63.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding validity of lease contract between parties in civil proceedings.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 63/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia granted permission for an appeal against the second instance court's decision. The second instance court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 18,210.00 EUR based on the invalidity of a lease contract between the parties. The court determined that the conditions for allowing an appeal under Article 367.a of the Act on Civil Procedure Law were met regarding the application of substantive law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure Law; An appeal is permitted when the second instance court incorrectly applies substantive law to determine the invalidity of a contract between the parties.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure law appeal permission substantive law application contract invalidity second instance court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367.a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure Law (ZPP)
Article 324 paragraph 7 of the Act on Civil Procedure Law (ZPP)
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 238/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal admissibility request due to non-payment of court fees within the statutory deadline.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 100/2020
Supreme Court allows review regarding whether a client must grant an additional time limit to a contractor upon contract termination.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 169/2020
Supreme Court allows review regarding whether a plaintiff must prove their own loss in unjust enrichment claims.
VSL sklep I Cp 2550/2009
Appeal allowed; court ruled first instance must conduct material procedural leadership regardless of lawyer representation.
Sklep II DoR 237/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request because court fee was paid after the legal deadline expired.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: Ali je sodišče druge stopnje pravilno uporabilo materialno pravo, ko je v okoliščinah konkretnega primera presodilo, da je najemna pogodba, sklenjena med pravdnima strankama, neveljavna?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja ali je sodišče druge stopnje pravilno uporabilo materialno pravo, ko je v okoliščinah konkretnega primera presodilo, da je najemna pogodba, sklenjena med pravdnima strankama, neveljavna.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je v delu, ki je relevanten za odločanje o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, pritožbi ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek tožeče stranke za plačilo 18.210,00 EUR s pripadki.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).