Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 100/2020 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2020:III.DOR.100.2020 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding whether a client must grant an additional time limit to a contractor upon contract termination.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 100/2020
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the request for leave to appeal specifically concerning the issue of whether a client must provide an additional reasonable time limit to a contractor upon termination under Article 628 of the Obligations Code. The lower courts had dismissed the claim for payment of 18,300 EUR, but the Supreme Court found the conditions for review met under the first paragraph of Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Consequently, the review was permitted solely on the legal question of the necessity for an extended performance period, leaving the substantive dispute for the appellate court to resolve.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 628 of the Obligations Code; Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure: Upon termination of a contract for work by the client, the client is obligated to grant the contractor a reasonable additional time limit for performance.

Keywords

AI generated
contract for work termination of contract additional time limit reasonable period Obligations Code Code of Civil Procedure leave to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 628 of the Obligations Code
Article 367.a of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS Sklep III DoR 129/2021
Supreme Court rejects appeal permission request due to failure to specify the precise legal question under ZPP 367b(4).
Sklep III DoR 62/2012
Supreme Court allows review to determine if lower courts ruled on a matter already finally decided.
VSRS sklep II DoR 297/2015
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of lawyer qualification and low-value dispute. Appeal request rejected for missing bar exam proof and low-value case. Court rules appeal inadmissible without lawyer qualification or bar exam proof. Dismissed appeal request due to missing lawyer qualification and low-value dispute. Appeal rejected for missing bar exam proof and low-value case. Appeal request dismissed for missing lawyer qualification and low-value dispute.
Sklep II DoR 629/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request and voids tax order due to duplicate tax payment.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 169/2020
Supreme Court allows review regarding whether a plaintiff must prove their own loss in unjust enrichment claims.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: ali je naročnik ob odstopu od podjemne pogodbe po 628. členu Obligacijskega zakonika podjemniku dolžan dati primeren dodatni rok za izpolnitev?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: ali je naročnik ob odstopu od podjemne pogodbe po 628. členu OZ podjemniku dolžan dati primeren dodatni rok za izpolnitev.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je v delu, ki je relevanten za odločanje o predlogu za dopustitev revizije, zavrnilo pritožbo in potrdilo zavrnilno sodbo sodišča prve stopnje glede tožbenega zahtevka za plačilo 18.300,00 EUR s pripadki.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

4. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).