Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Popravni sklep II Cpg 10/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:POPRAVNI.II.CPG.10.2019 AI generated

Court corrects appeal decision by replacing 'creditor' with 'defendant' due to clerical error.

Case Number VSL Popravni sklep II Cpg 10/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court issued a corrective order to amend a previous judgment containing a clerical error. The plaintiff had pointed out that the lower court mistakenly identified the appellant as the 'creditor' when the actual appellant was the defendant and debtor. The court ruled that the error was a clear written mistake under the relevant procedural law, necessitating the substitution of the correct party designation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 328. člen: The court may issue a corrective order to amend a judgment when a clear written error is identified, ensuring the correct legal parties are designated in the final ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
corrective order clerical error written mistake party designation procedural amendment appellate correction judgment rectification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
328. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSRS sklep II Ips 319/2015
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to missing signature, rejecting broad interpretation of formal requirements.
VSL sklep I Cpg 507/2016
Appeal dismissed; late appeal rejected as negligence rather than obvious mistake under ZPP rules.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 578/2019
Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom odločilo, da se pritožba prve toženke z dne 11.1.2019 zoper sodbo in sklep Okrožnega sodišča v Kranju, opr.
VSM sklep Cpg 338/93
Appeal dismissed because objection filed after deadline; court ruled procedural defect bars review.
VSL Sklep I Cp 2306/2018
Court dismisses appeal withdrawal request as procedural outcome requires formal court finding of withdrawal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sodba Višjega sodišča v Ljubljani II Cpg 10/2019 z dne 23. julij 2019 se v I. točki izreka popravi tako, da se beseda „upnik“ nadomesti z besedno zvezo „tožena stranka“.

[JEDRO]

Popravni sklep, izdan v zvezi z odločbo VSL Sodba in sklep II Cpg 10/2019 z dne 23. 7. 2019 (VSL00026806).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Po izdaji odločbe naslovnega sodišča II Cpg 10/2019 z dne 23. julij 2019 je tožeča stranka sodišče opozorila na očitno pisno pomoto. Pritožbeno sodišče je pomotoma navedlo, da je upnik izpodbijal I. in III. točko izreka sodbe Okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani IX Pg 211/2018-19 z dne 31. 7. 2018. Sodbo sodišča prve stopnje je s pritožbo izpodbijala tožena stranka, dolžnik.

Pritožbeno sodišče je na podlagi prvega odstavka 328. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku s popravnim sklepom popravilo očitno pisno napako.