Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 163/2019-7 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:III.DOR.163.2019.7 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review regarding insurer liability for non-payment of first premium installment under installment agreement.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 163/2019-7
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted a review application concerning whether an insurer's liability arose from the non-payment of the first premium installment under a specific installment agreement. The lower courts had previously ruled that the defendant was obligated to pay damages but reserved the final decision on the claim's value and legal costs. The review was granted solely because the specific question regarding the insurer's liability based on the non-payment constitutes a significant legal issue, while other questions were deemed unimportant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: A review application is admissible if it concerns a significant legal issue, such as whether an insurer's liability arises from the non-payment of the first premium installment under an installment agreement.

Keywords

AI generated
insurer liability non-payment of premium installment agreement review admissibility supreme court review insurance contract damages obligation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSRS Sodba III Ips 24/2020-3
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; insurance coverage did not start because first premium installment was not paid at contract signing.
VSM Sodba I Cp 161/2019
Court dismisses appeal in traffic accident case, upholding first instance liability finding against defendant.
VSL sodba I Cp 2114/2016
Appeal dismissed; parents liable for child's school violence due to lack of pre-incident professional help.
VSC Sodba Cp 397/2022
Court dismisses claim against fire brigade member for damages caused during official competition activities.
VSC Sodba Cp 32/2020
Appeal dismissed; insurer liable for car accident damages as policyholder fulfilled police notification duty.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je zaradi neplačila prvega obroka premije ob upoštevanju dogovora o obročnem odplačilu premije nastopilo zavarovalno jamstvo oziroma odgovornost tožene stranke kot zavarovalnice za plačilo škode?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je zaradi neplačila prvega obroka premije ob upoštevanju dogovora o obročnem odplačilu premije nastopilo zavarovalno jamstvo oziroma odgovornost tožene stranke kot zavarovalnice za plačilo škode.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z vmesno sodbo razsodilo, da je podana obveznost tožene stranke za plačilo odškodnine za škodo, ki jo je tožeča stranka utrpela v škodnem dogodku z dne 16. 6. 2017 (I. točka izreka). Odločitev o višini zahtevka in o pravdnih stroških je pridržalo za končno odločbo (II. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje spremenilo tako, da je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo (I. točka izreka). Odločilo je, da mora tožeča stranka toženki stranki povrniti stroške postopka (II. in III. točka izreka), tožeča stranka pa sama nosi svoje stroške odgovora na pritožbo (IV. točka izreka)

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje tožeča stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo. Glede preostalih zastavljenih vprašanj predlogu ni ugodilo, saj vprašanja niso pomembna pravna vprašanja.