Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep R 240/2019 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2019:R.240.2019 AI generated

Civil court dismissed jurisdiction objection; parties are companies requiring district court under ZPP Art. 32(2) and 481(1).

Case Number VSL Sklep R 240/2019
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Škofja Loka initiated a jurisdiction dispute under Article 24 of the Civil Procedure Act, arguing it lacked territorial and subject-matter competence. The court correctly identified that both parties are limited liability companies, making this a commercial dispute governed by Article 481(1) and Article 32(2) of the Act. Consequently, the Court of Appeal ruled that the District Court in Kranju is the competent authority for further proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 24 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 32(2) and Article 481(1) of the Civil Procedure Act: When parties are legal persons, the dispute is commercial and falls under the jurisdiction of the District Court.

Keywords

AI generated
commercial dispute jurisdiction legal persons parties subject matter competence territorial jurisdiction Civil Procedure Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 24 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 481(1) of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 32(2) of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL Sklep Rg 143/2017
Court dismisses jurisdiction objection, ruling Okrainsko court competent for civil dispute under 20k threshold.
Sklep I R 80/99
Supreme Court rejects transfer of custody case to Ljubljana due to local court backlog and speed requirements.
VSL sklep Rg 435/2015
Civil court jurisdiction confirmed for non-economic dispute under 700 EUR value between private parties.
Sklep I R 81/2006
Exclusive territorial jurisdiction in enforcement proceedings lies with the court where the debtor resides.
VSL sklep I R 142/2015
Appeal dismissed; jurisdiction determined by claim value under 20,000 EUR for enforcement proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi je pristojno Okrožno sodišče v Kranju.

[JEDRO]

Pravdni stranki sta gospodarski družbi (družbi z omejeno odgovornostjo), zato gre za gospodarski spor, za katerega je za sojenje pristojno okrožno sodišče.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Okrajno sodišče v Škofji Loki, ki mu je bila zadeva na podlagi sklepa Okrajnega sodišča v Ljubljani VL 32342/2019 z dne 24. 9. 2019 odstopljena v reševanje kot stvarno in krajevno pristojnemu sodišču, je sprožilo spor o pristojnosti na podlagi 24. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku – ZPP.

2. Razlogi, zaradi katerih Okrajno sodišče v Škofji Loki meni, da ni stvarno niti krajevno pristojno za reševanje zadeve, so utemeljeni. Pravilno opozarja, da sta tako tožeča kot tožena stranka gospodarski družbi (družbi z omejeno odgovornostjo), zato gre v skladu s 1. točko prvega odstavka 481. člena ZPP za gospodarski spor, za katerega je za sojenje v skladu s 7. točko drugega odstavka 32. člena ZPP pristojno okrožno sodišče.

3. V skladu s prvim odstavkom 25. člena ZPP je pritožbeno sodišče odločilo, da je za nadaljnje odločanje v tej zadevi pristojno Okrožno sodišče v Kranju.