Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep X DoR 56/2019-4 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2019:X.DOR.56.2019.4 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review of administrative court's failure to hold main hearing and question plaintiff.

Case Number VSRS Sklep X DoR 56/2019-4
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted a review application regarding the Administrative Court's decision to rule on the merits without holding a main hearing or questioning the plaintiff. The plaintiff challenged the Bank of Slovenia's extraordinary measures and capital increase decisions, arguing the lack of oral proceedings violated procedural rights. The court determined that the specific circumstances met the statutory criteria for allowing the review despite the procedural irregularity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku 367.a; Review is permitted when the lower court fails to hold a main hearing or question the plaintiff, provided the specific circumstances align with established criteria from the Supreme Court, Constitutional Court, and ECHR.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative review procedural fairness main hearing requirement oral questioning supreme court criteria

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a paragraph 1 of the Act on Legal Proceedings
324 paragraph 7 of the Act on Legal Proceedings
AI generated
VSL sklep IV Cpg 1796/2014
Appeal dismissed; former shareholders lack standing after Constitutional Court upheld bank law amendments.
VSRS Sklep I Up 158/2017
Supreme Court allows former bank board members to sue Bank of Slovenia regarding extraordinary measures.
UPRS sklep I U 14/2014
Administrative court dismisses bondholders' lawsuit for invalidity due to lack of standing under ZUS-1.
UPRS Sodba I U 1570/2018-63
Administrative court dismisses challenge to Bank of Slovenia's capital reduction and recapitalization of insolvent bank A. d.d. under ZBan-1.
sklep G 1/2003
Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit against Bank of Slovenia's rejection of deposit ban order appeal due to lack of legal standing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo ravnanje Upravnega sodišča, ki v zadevi ni razpisalo glavne obravnave in ni zaslišalo tožeče stranke, temveč je odločilo na seji, zakonito in v skladu z vzpostavljenimi kriteriji Vrhovnega sodišča, Ustavnega sodišča in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja:

- ali je bilo ravnanje Upravnega sodišča, ki v zadevi ni razpisalo glavne obravnave in ni zaslišalo tožeče stranke, temveč je odločilo na seji, zakonito in v skladu z vzpostavljenimi kriteriji Vrhovnega sodišča, Ustavnega sodišča in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Upravno sodišče je zavrnilo tožbo za ugotovitev nezakonitosti in odpravo odločb Banke Slovenije o izrednih ukrepih PBH 24.20-030/13-009 z dne 17. 12. 2013 in o potrditvi povečanja osnovnega kapitala banke 24.20-030/13-010 z dne 18. 12. 2013.

2. Zoper sodbo Upravnega sodišča tožnica vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa.

4. Senat je odločitev sprejel soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).