Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cp 1011/2018 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2018:I.CP.1011.2018 AI generated

Appeal withdrawn in court settlement; higher court rules withdrawal effective immediately under ZPP. Appeal dismissed.

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cp 1011/2018
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant withdrew the appeal during a court settlement concluded on May 15, 2018, at the District Court in Kranj. The withdrawal was made as a formal statement before the court, which possesses direct effects on the proceedings. Consequently, the Higher Court in Ljubljana ruled that the appeal is withdrawn immediately, as the second-instance court had not yet issued a decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku: An appeal withdrawal statement made during a court settlement before a court with direct procedural effects is immediately effective, terminating the appeal without a substantive ruling by the higher court.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal court settlement direct procedural effects Zakon o pravdnem postopku immediate termination higher court decision procedural outcome

Cited Legislation

AI generated
drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Ker sodišče druge stopnje o pritožbi še ni odločilo, je odločilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa (drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).
AI generated
VSL Sklep IV Cp 1253/2023
Appeal dismissed as parties agreed in court settlement to withdraw appeal and counterclaim.
VSL Sklep Cst 335/2020
Appeal dismissed; personal bankruptcy rejected due to lack of assets and withdrawn debt discharge request.
VSM sklep I Cp 1197/2015
Appeal dismissed; withdrawal valid before defendant files answer; procedural timing determines consent need.
VSRS Sklep I Up 149/2017
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against administrative costs ruling as general exclusion applies under ZUS-1.
VSK sklep I Cpg 54/2000
Appeal dismissed; new plaintiff joins suit in existing procedural state despite irregular first summons.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je pritožba umaknjena.

[JEDRO]

Izjava o umiku pritožbe, vsebovana v sodni poravnavi, je izjava, dana pred sodiščem, ki ima neposredne učinke v postopku. Ker sodišče druge stopnje o pritožbi še ni odločilo, je odločilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Pritožnik je v okviru sodne poravnave, sklenjene 15. 5. 2018 pri Okrajnem sodišču v Kranju v zadevi P 22/2017 podal izjavo o umiku obravnavane pritožbe.

2. Izjava o umiku pritožbe, vsebovana v sodni poravnavi, je izjava, dana pred sodiščem, ki ima neposredne učinke v postopku. Ker sodišče druge stopnje o pritožbi še ni odločilo, je odločilo, kot izhaja iz izreka tega sklepa (drugi odstavek 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).