Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep I Up 274/2016 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2018:I.UP.274.2016 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawn by plaintiff before final judgment under administrative procedure law.

Case Number VSRS Sklep I Up 274/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia declared the appeal withdrawn and dismissed the case. The plaintiff lodged an appeal against a first-instance decision rejecting her claim regarding police misconduct but subsequently withdrew the appeal via letter before the court issued a ruling. The court applied the Administrative Procedure Act and the Code of Civil Procedure to recognize the withdrawal as valid since it occurred prior to the second-instance decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o upravnem sporu, 22. člen; Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 334. člen: An appeal may be withdrawn by the party at any time before the court of second instance issues its decision, resulting in the termination of the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal withdrawal second instance procedure Zakon o upravnem sporu Zakon o pravdnem postopku termination of proceedings plaintiff withdrawal supreme court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1), 22. člen
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 334. člen
AI generated
Sklep I Up 149/2008
Administrative court dismissed appeal for rejecting complaint against police response letter as non-reviewable act.
Sodba IV Ips 188/2010
Supreme Court quashes lower court decision for lack of evidence proving cohabitation in a de facto union under public order law.
VSC Sodba PRp 39/2021
Appeal granted; court found defendant's words to a 12-year-old did not constitute a malicious insult offense.
VSL Sodba II Kp 58397/2017
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for obstructing official acts due to specific threat of violence.
Sodba II Ips 82/2008
Civil court rejects claim that criminal investigation interruption resets civil statute of limitations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožeča stranka umaknila pritožbo.

[JEDRO]

Ker je pritožnica pritožbo umaknila preden je Vrhovno sodišče o njej odločilo, je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu z določbami ZPP in ZUS-1 ugotovilo njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom odločilo, da se zavrže tožba tožeče stranke, ki jo je vložila zaradi dejanj, s katerimi so delavci policije posegli v njene človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine.

2. Tožeča stranka (v nadaljevanju pritožnica) je zoper navedeni sklep vložila pritožbo, ki pa jo je z dopisom z dne 22. 5. 2018 umaknila.

3. Po določbi prvega odstavka 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (v nadaljevanju ZUS-1) se za vprašanja postopka, ki v ZUS-1 niso urejena, primerno uporabljajo določbe Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP). Vprašanje umika pritožbe v ZUS-1 ni urejeno, ZPP pa v drugem odstavku 334. člena določa, da lahko stranka, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe, umakne že vloženo pritožbo. Ker je v obravnavanem primeru pritožnica pritožbo umaknila preden je Vrhovno sodišče o njej odločilo, je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu z navedenimi določbami ZPP in ZUS-1 ugotovilo njen umik.

4. V zadevi je na podlagi drugega odstavka 14. člena ZUS-1 odločal sodnik posameznik.