Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 50/2017-9 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2017:III.DOR.50.2017.9 AI generated

Supreme Court allows review to determine if ZPIZ-2 Art. 193 is lex specialis over ZOZP Art. 18.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 50/2017-9
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the request for leave to appeal regarding a specific legal question. The appellant argued that Article 193 of the Old-Pension and Disability Insurance Act (ZPIZ-2) should prevail over Article 18 of the Compulsory Traffic Insurance Act (ZOZP) based on the principle of lex specialis. The court found the request admissible because the parties demonstrated a need for legal certainty and uniform application of the law, noting inconsistent practices among higher courts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 193 of the Old-Pension and Disability Insurance Act; Article 18 of the Compulsory Traffic Insurance Act: A specific provision prevails over a general one when both apply to the same legal relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
lex specialis Old-Pension Insurance Act Compulsory Traffic Insurance Act legal certainty uniform application of law leave to appeal conflict of provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 193 of the Old-Pension and Disability Insurance Act
Article 18 of the Compulsory Traffic Insurance Act
Article 367a of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cpg 355/2023
Court dismisses appeal and remands case to first instance for new trial on breach of duty to inform.
VSC sodba Cp 334/2016
Appeal dismissed; highway maintenance company held liable for negligence in traffic signal placement causing accident.
VDSS sodba Pdp 100/2014
Employment court partially allows appeal on severance pay continuity and lawyer fees for retrial.
VSM Sklep I Cp 933/2018
Appeal allowed; detention compensation awarded if no subsequent conviction is issued.
VSM sodba I Cp 1104/2014
Court dismisses insurer's claim against vehicle owner for drunk driver's fault, ruling liability rests with the driver, not the owner.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je določba 193. člena ZPIZ-2 glede na določbo 18. člena ZOZP v prometu lex specialis.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je določba 193. člena Zakona o pokojninskem in invalidskem zavarovanju (ZPIZ-2) glede na določbo 18. člena Zakona o obveznih zavarovanjih v prometu lex specialis.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je, v delu relevantnem za odločanje o predlogu, zavrnilo zahtevek za plačilo 5.340,95 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 14. 10. 2014 in zahtevek za plačilo 10.677,52 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 4. 5. 2016 dalje do plačila (2. točka izreka sodbe in sklepa). Sodišče druge stopnje pa je v tem delu pritožbo tožeče stranke zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo (drugi odstavek I. točke izreka sodbe).

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožnica vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije, v katerem zatrjuje zmotno uporabo materialnega prava. Pomembnost predlaganega vprašanja utemeljuje z zagotovitvijo pravne varnosti in enotne uporabe prava. Zatrjuje neenotno sodno prakso višjih sodišč ob neobstoju sodne prakse Vrhovnega sodišča.

3. Predlog je utemeljen.

4. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku so izpolnjeni glede vprašanja, navedenega v izreku tega sklepa. Vrhovno sodišče je zato revizijo dopustilo.