Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSL sklep II Cp 8/2017 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2017:II.CP.8.2017 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because a ruling returning a claim for correction is a procedural management act not appealable under ZPP.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cp 8/2017
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the first-instance court's decision to return a claim for correction. The plaintiff argued the ruling was unlawful, but the court determined it was a procedural management act under Article 270 of the Civil Procedure Act. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as such acts are not subject to appeal, and the original decision was confirmed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

čl. 270 ZPP; čl. 365 tč. 2 ZPP: A ruling returning a claim for correction constitutes a procedural management act of the court leadership, which is not appealable; therefore, appeals against such rulings must be dismissed.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural management act claim for correction non-appealable ruling court leadership decision Civil Procedure Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Sklep, s katerim sodišče vrača stranki v popravo njeno vlogo, je sklep procesnega vodstva, zoper katerega ni dovoljena pritožba.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje zavrglo pritožbo tožnika zoper sklep z dne 3.5.2016.

2. Zoper tak sklep se smiselno pritožuje tožnik in navaja, da vrača sklep, ker odločitev ni skladna z veljavno zakonodajo.

3. Pritožba ni utemeljena.

4. Sklep, s katerim sodišče vrača stranki v popravo njeno vlogo, je sklep procesnega vodstva, zoper katerega ni dovoljena pritožba (tretji odstavek čl. 270 ZPP), tako da je sodišče prve stopnje pravilno zavrglo pritožbo tožnika. Ker je odločitev sodišča prve stopnje pravilna, je bilo tožnikovo pritožbo, ki vsebinsko ne obrazloži v čem je sodišče ravnalo nezakonito, zavrniti in potrditi izpodbijani sklep (čl. 365 tč. 2 ZPP).