Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cpg 1403/2016 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2017:I.CPG.1403.2016 AI generated

Slovenian court dismisses appeal when appellant withdraws appeal before appellate court renders decision.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cpg 1403/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The first-instance court rejected the appellant's request for a fee reduction and ordered payment of court costs. The appellant lodged an appeal but subsequently withdrew it on January 16, 2017, before the appellate court could issue a ruling. The appellate court accepted the withdrawal and terminated the proceedings pursuant to Section 334 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 334. člen ZPP; If a party withdraws an appeal before the appellate court decides, the court acknowledges the withdrawal and terminates the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal termination of proceedings appellate court court costs civil procedure act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odstavek 334. člen ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cp 1105/2020
Appeal dismissed; court upheld partial tax waiver as full waiver conditions were not met due to applicant's income and assets.
VDSS sklep Pdp 193/2014
Appeal partially allowed; court grants partial tax exemption and payment deferral for unemployed father with children.
VSK sklep Cpg 113/2016
Appeal dismissed: bankruptcy liquidation does not automatically grant fee waiver; full payment required unless impossible.
VSC Sklep II Ip 248/2024
Court dismisses appeal against tax fee waiver denial due to applicant's failure to prove business disruption.
VSL sklep I Cpg 1498/2013
Court dismisses appeal against refusal of full court fee waiver for legal entity due to new law restrictions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Umik pritožbe z dne 16. 1. 2017 se vzame na znanje in se postopek konča.

[JEDRO]

Ker je pritožnica umaknila že vloženo pritožbo, preden je pritožbeno sodišče odločilo njej, je pritožbeno sodišče s tem sklepom umik pritožbe le še vzelo na znanje in postopek ustavilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Z izpodbijanim sklepom je prvostopenjsko sodišče zavrnilo tako predlog tožeče stranke za delno oprostitev plačila sodne takse, kot tudi podredni predlog za odlog ali obročno plačilo sodne takse. Z istim sklepom je tožeči stranki naložilo še plačilo sodne takse.

2. Zoper sklep je vložila tožeča stranka pritožbo. Pritožbo je z vlogo z dne 16. 1. 2017 umaknila.

3. Ker je pritožnica umaknila že vloženo pritožbo, preden je pritožbeno sodišče odločilo njej, je pritožbeno sodišče s tem sklepom umik pritožbe le še vzelo na znanje in postopek ustavilo (2. odstavek 334. člena ZPP).