Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VDSS sklep Pdp 774/2016 ECLI:SI:VDSS:2016:PDP.774.2016 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the applicant lacks standing and no further appeal exists against rejection of an appeal.

Case Number VDSS sklep Pdp 774/2016
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Higher Labour and Social Court rejected the applicant's appeal against the appellate court's decision to dismiss their earlier complaint. The applicant argued against the finding that their late-filed request was untimely and lacked necessary procedural elements. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because the applicant lacks standing to appeal a rejection of an appeal, and no further legal remedy exists under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 343 and 346 of the Act on Legal Proceedings; An appeal against a decision rejecting an appeal is inadmissible if the appellant lacks standing, as no further legal remedy is provided by law.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of standing rejection of appeal procedural admissibility legal remedy exhaustion appellate review limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 343 of the Act on Legal Proceedings
Article 346 of the Act on Legal Proceedings
AI generated
VSRS Sklep III DoR 102/2023
Supreme Court allows appeal review regarding excessive court fee valuation and procedural termination objections.
VSRS Sklep I Up 22/2026
Administrative appeal dismissed because plaintiff lacked a law degree required to file the appeal personally.
VSM Sklep I Cpg 154/2021
Appeal partially allowed; bankruptcy court jurisdiction over creditor claim verification disputes confirmed.
VSRS sklep III DoR 35/2016
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to attorney's power of attorney being issued before client gained filing rights.
VSM Sklep I Cp 325/2023
Appeal dismissed; no separate appeal for transcript objection under ZPP Art. 125a; only objection to main judgment allowed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Pritožba je nedovoljena, če jo vloži oseba, ki nima te pravice (343. člen ZPP). Ker ZPP zoper sklep pritožbenega sodišča o zavrženju pritožbe ne predvideva pritožbe, torej rednega pravnega sredstva, obravnava vlagateljeve pritožbe na pritožbeni stopnji ni dopustna in se zato vlagateljeva pritožba zavrže (346. člen ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Vlagatelj pritožbe izpodbija sklep pritožbenega sodišča Pdp 569/2016 z dne 18. 8. 2016, s katerim je zavrnilo vlagateljevo pritožbo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje z dne 1. 6. 2016 o zavrženju vloge z dne 27. 4. 2016.

2. Vlagatelj v pritožbi izraža nestrinjanje s stališčem pritožbenega sodišča, ki je soglašalo z razlogovanjem sodišča prve stopnje, da je bila vloga z dne 27. 4. 2016 prepozno popravljena in da tudi sicer še vedno ni sposobna za obravnavo, saj vlagatelj ni predložil zadostnega števila vlog, ni postavil tožbenega zahtevka (105., 108. in 180. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP, Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in nasl.), niti ni vložil prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč, da bi se na takšen način podaljšal odrejeni rok za popravo oziroma dopolnitev vloge.

3. Pritožba ni dovoljena.

4. Pritožba je nedovoljena, če jo vloži oseba, ki nima te pravice (343. člen ZPP). Ker ZPP zoper sklep pritožbenega sodišča o zavrženju pritožbe ne predvideva pritožbe, torej rednega pravnega sredstva, obravnava vlagateljeve pritožbe na pritožbeni stopnji ni dopustna in se zato vlagateljeva pritožba zavrže (346. člen ZPP).