Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS sklep III DoR 29/2015 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2015:III.DOR.29.2015 AI generated

Appeal allowed regarding whether OZ Art. 355(1)(6) applies to residential commercial building managers.

Case Number VSRS sklep III DoR 29/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the appeal request specifically concerning the applicability of Article 355(1)(6) of the Obligations Act to managers of residential commercial buildings. The lower court had previously invalidated an enforcement decision against the defendant for failing to pay over 3,600 EUR in damages and costs. The Supreme Court permitted the appeal only on the narrow legal question of statutory interpretation, rejecting broader review as it did not involve significant legal issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 355(1)(6) of the Obligations Act; Article 367.a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure; The appeal is admissible only if the question concerns the applicability of the specific provision to the manager of a residential commercial building, as this constitutes a significant legal issue.

Keywords

AI generated
Obligations Act commercial building manager residential property civil procedure appeal statutory interpretation enforcement decision significant legal issue

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 355(1)(6) of the Obligations Act
Article 367.a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cpg 109/2016
Court partially allows appeal on building maintenance fees, ruling local ordinances cannot override statutory owner obligations.
VSL sodba II Cpg 1675/2015
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance judgment on execution of claim barred by prior set-off.
VSL Sodba II Cp 2088/2019
Appeal dismissed; consumer lender proved it notified account holder of overdrafts, satisfying statutory requirements for interest claims.
VSL sodba II Cp 2488/2015
Appeal dismissed; insurer cannot claim subrogation against owner for driver's breach of policy terms.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1248/2010
Appeal dismissed; tenant failed to prove oral agreement for lower rent, so higher contractual rate stands.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali določba 6. točke prvega odstavka 355. člena OZ velja tudi za upravnika stanovanjsko poslovne stavbe?

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja ali določba 6. točke prvega odstavka 355. člena OZ velja tudi za upravnika stanovanjsko poslovne stavbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je v delu, relevantnem za presojo predloga, pravnomočno razveljavilo sklep o izvršbi, na podlagi katerega je bila tožena stranka dolžna tožeči stranki plačati 3.604,94 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi in stroški izvršilnega postopka ter tožbeni zahtevek v tem delu zavrnilo.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožeča stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo. Glede preostalih zastavljenih vprašanj pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso izpolnjeni, saj ne gre za pomembna pravna vprašanja.