Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
UPRS sklep IV U 217/2013 ECLI:SI:UPRS:2014:IV.U.217.2013 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses case when plaintiff withdraws lawsuit without defendant consent under Slovenian law.

Case Number UPRS sklep IV U 217/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court terminated the proceedings because the plaintiff withdrew their lawsuit without the defendant's consent. The plaintiff initially requested the full revocation of the challenged administrative acts and the defendant's costs, but formally withdrew the claim on May 9, 2014. The court ruled that under the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, withdrawal without consent requires a procedural termination, resulting in the dismissal of the case and allocation of costs to the withdrawing party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 34 of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act; Article 25, paragraph 4 of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act: A plaintiff may withdraw a lawsuit without the defendant's consent, which obliges the court to terminate the proceedings by ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative lawsuit withdrawal consent requirement procedural termination administrative dispute resolution cost allocation rules

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 34 of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act
Article 25, paragraph 4 of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act
AI generated
UPRS sklep I U 260/2014
Administrative court dismisses appeal and halts proceedings upon plaintiff's withdrawal of the lawsuit.
Sklep I Up 239/2009
Administrative appeal dismissed; each party bears own costs when court suspends proceedings under ZUS-1.
Sklep I Up 451/2007
Administrative court dismisses premature lawsuit for non-existent administrative act regarding civil scholarship contract.
VDSS sodba Psp 330/2016
Court dismisses appeal; pension recalculation requires administrative review if new wage data affects benefit amount.
VDSS Sodba Psp 244/2020
Appeal court allows appeal, ruling that pension stop dates and overpayment determinations are legally distinct and non-exclusive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Postopek se ustavi.

Vsaka stranka trpi svoje stroške postopka.

[JEDRO]

Ker je tožnik tožbo umaknil, je sodišče postopek ustavilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožnik je vložil tožbo zoper v uvodu naveden sklep in odločbo ter sodišču predlagal, da tožbi ugodi, izpodbijani sklep in odločbo v celoti odpravi, zadevo pa vrne toženi stranki v ponovni postopek ter naloži toženki povrnitev stroškov postopka.

Tožnik je dne 9. 5. 2014 sodišču poslal dopis o umiku tožbe in zahtevka zoper izpodbijani

sklep in odločbo Ministrstvo za delo, družino in socialne zadeve in enake možnosti, št. 0144-12/2011-52 z dne 24. 7. 2013

.

Po 34. členu Zakona o upravnem sporu (v nadaljevanju ZUS-1) tožnik umakne tožbo brez privolitve toženca do pravnomočne odločbe. Če se tožba umakne, sodišče postopek s sklepom ustavi.

Odločitev o stroškovnem zahtevku tožnika je sodišče sprejelo na podlagi četrtega odstavka 25. člena ZUS-1.