Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 92/2013 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2013:III.DOR.92.2013 AI generated

Appeal allowed regarding definition of normal management transactions exceeding 50% owner approval.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 92/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the appeal request to permit a review of the first-instance judgment. The defendant argued that a transaction approved by over 50% of co-owners should qualify as a normal management transaction regardless of price, while the plaintiff contended otherwise. The court allowed the review only on the specific question of whether such a transaction constitutes normal management, deeming other aspects not significant legal issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 367.a odst. 1: A review is permitted only if it addresses a significant legal question; the court determined that the specific issue of whether a transaction approved by over 50% of co-owners constitutes normal management qualifies as such, while other aspects do not meet the threshold for review.

Keywords

AI generated
normal management transaction co-owner approval threshold significant legal question review of judgment property law procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL Sodba II Cp 93/2020
Court dismisses appeal where driver lost insurance rights by fleeing accident scene without providing policy details.
VSL sodba I Cp 3508/2015
Appeal dismissed; criminal conviction binds civil court on self-defense legality despite procedural errors.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1562/2012
Appeal dismissed; witness testimony insufficient to prove debt acknowledgment interrupting statute of limitations.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 20/2026
Court dismisses appeal upholding that a client cannot claim both defect removal and price reduction for the same work error.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1226/2013
Court allows appeal against enforcement order, voiding judgment for unpaid construction work without prior consent.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se revizija dopusti glede vprašanja:

Ali vsakršna izvedba posla, ki ga potrdi več kot 50 % solastnikov, ustreza poslu rednega upravljanja ne glede na to, da je dela, ki v celoti ohranjajo dosedanjo funkcionalnost, možno izvesti tudi po bistveno nižji ceni?

[JEDRO]

Dopuščena revizija glede vprašanja kdaj gre za posle rednega upravljanja.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je delno ohranilo v veljavi sklep o izvršbi, na podlagi katerega je tožena stranka dolžna tožeči stranki plačati 14.303,26 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi, v preostanku (za 3.470,85 EUR) pa je sklep o izvršbi razveljavilo in tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo. Sodišče druge stopnje je prvostopenjsko sodbo potrdilo.

2. Zoper odločitev sodišča druge stopnje tožena stranka vlaga predlog za dopustitev revizije. Revizijsko sodišče ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku glede pravnega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku sklepa. Revizijo je zato v tem obsegu dopustilo.

3. Glede preostalega postavljenega vprašanja pa pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso izpolnjeni, saj ne gre za pomembno pravno vprašanje.