Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 440/2011 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2011:II.DOR.440.2011 AI generated

Appeal against noise damage compensation dismissed as it aligns with established judicial practice.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 440/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a revision of the second-instance judgment. The applicant argued that the awarded compensation for noise damage from increased traffic was excessively high and deviated from comparable case law. The court determined that the compensation amount was consistent with established judicial practice, thereby finding no grounds to allow the revision under the relevant procedural statutes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure; Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Act on Civil Procedure: A request for permission to revise a judgment is inadmissible if the awarded compensation does not deviate from established judicial practice.

Keywords

AI generated
noise damage compensation judicial practice deviation revision permission request civil procedure law traffic noise liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL Sodba II Cp 1656/2018
Court dismisses claim for damages in traffic accident case due to lack of causal link between minor force and injuries.
VSL sklep I Cp 375/2009
Insurance subrogation claim dismissed due to lack of factual basis regarding driver's intoxication and procedural errors.
Sodba II Ips 163/2009
Court dismisses appeal against liability for slip and fall on unkept sidewalk due to negligence.
VSRS Sklep VIII DoR 132/2023-8
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding procedural violations and interpretation of settlement agreement in employment termination dispute.
VSL Sodba I Cp 1411/2023
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance judgment on civil liability for negligence in sports injury case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker je odškodnina odmerjena v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso, je bil predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnjen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razsodilo, da mora toženka prvi tožnici plačati 6.200 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 19. 10. 2006 do plačila in ji povrniti 1.426,13 EUR pravdnih stroškov.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje v zvezi s sodbo sodišča prve stopnje je tožena stranka na podlagi 367. b člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije, v katerem zatrjuje, da je sodišče prvi tožnici prisodilo previsoko odškodnino zaradi imisije hrupa od povečanega tranzitnega prometa na cesti G1-3 na relaciji Pesnica – Vučja vas, ki odstopa od primerljive sodne prakse.

4. Predlog ni utemeljen.

5. Ker prisojena odškodnina ne odstopa od primerljive sodne prakse in zato niso podani razlogi za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367. a člena ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367. c člena ZPP).