Court dismisses appeal for failing to specify evidence requirements, rejecting vague objections as inadmissible.

The Second Instance Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment, ruling that the defendant's objection was too vague to justify evidence collection. The defendant submitted a general objection without specifying which facts needed proof, while the plaintiff argued that such undefined objections prevent proper judicial proceedings. The court held that without concrete allegations, it is impossible to determine what facts require verification, rendering the so-called informational evidence inadmissible in the legal process.