Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep VIII Ips 202/2011 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2012:VIII.IPS.202.2011 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case, ruling withdrawal allowed before final court decision.

Case Number Sklep VIII Ips 202/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia ruled that the appellant withdrew their appeal before a final decision was issued. The appellant had previously lost a labor dispute regarding contract termination and attempted to challenge the judgment via appeal, but subsequently submitted a statement withdrawing the appeal. The court applied the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the withdrawal of an appeal, concluding that the withdrawal was valid and effective.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 334. člen (2. odstavek); 383. člen: An appellant may withdraw a lodged appeal until the court issues a decision on it, at which point the withdrawal becomes effective.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal labor dispute code of civil procedure supreme court ruling procedural withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 334. člen (2. odstavek)
Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 383. člen
AI generated
VDSS Sodba Pdp 593/2021
Appeal dismissed; employer's arbitrary selection of employee for dismissal despite redundancy violates anti-discrimination law.
VDSS sodba Pdp 65/2009
Appeal dismissed; dismissal of employment contract invalid due to lack of proven specific grounds for termination.
VDSS Sklep Pdp 441/2023
Appeal dismissed as time-barred; plaintiff filed after statutory 15-day deadline expired.
VDSS Sklep Pdp 797/2022
Appeal allowed; first-instance court dismissed appeal due to failure to quantify negligence duration regarding pool supervision. First-instance court dismissed appeal due to failure to quantify negligence duration regarding pool supervision.
Sklep VIII Ips 250/2001
Appeal allowed; lower court quashed disciplinary decision for exceeding scope of complaint regarding inventory return.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožena stranka umaknila revizijo.

[JEDRO]

Stranka lahko umakne vloženo revizijo, dokler sodišče o njej ne izda odločbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo, da se izredna odpoved pogodbe o zaposlitvi, ki jo je tožniku podala tožena stranka, razveljavi. Ugodilo je tudi reintegracijskemu ter reparacijskemu tožbenemu zahtevku.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo prvostopenjsko sodbo.

3. Zoper pravnomočno sodbo je tožena stranka vložila revizijo zaradi bistvenih kršitev določb pravdnega postopka. Po tem, ko je bila revizija predložena Vrhovnemu sodišču, je tožena stranka sodišču posredovala izjavo, da jo umika.

4. Umik revizije v Zakonu o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP, Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in naslednji) ni posebej urejen, zato se v skladu s 383. členom ZPP smiselno uporabljajo določbe tega zakona o umiku pritožbe. Na podlagi drugega odstavka 334. člena ZPP stranka lahko umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče o njej ne izda odločbe.

5. Ker je v obravnavani zadevi tožena stranka umaknila revizijo in ker do umika o njeni reviziji še ni bilo odločeno, je Vrhovno sodišče na podlagi navedenih zakonskih določb odločilo, kot je razvidno iz izreka sklepa.