Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 69/2012 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2012:I.R.69.2012 AI generated

Supreme Court delegates jurisdiction to Ljubljana court for economic efficiency and lower travel costs.

Case Number Sklep I R 69/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia delegated jurisdiction to the District Court in Ljubljana upon the joint request of both parties. Both parties and their representatives reside in or near Ljubljana, making the transfer economically efficient and reducing travel expenses. The court ruled that such delegation serves the principle of procedural economy and is permissible when clearly beneficial for the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure; The Supreme Court may delegate jurisdiction to another competent court upon party request to ensure greater procedural economy and reduce associated costs.

Keywords

AI generated
delegation of jurisdiction procedural economy civil procedure law travel costs party request competent court economic efficiency

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSRS Sklep I R 60/2022
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to Celje District Court based on cost efficiency and defendant's request.
VDS sklep Pdp 1100/2005
Labor court dismissed appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to absence of employment relationship.
VSRS Sklep I R 140/2022
Supreme Court delegates jurisdiction to Žalec District Court for guardianship termination to ensure procedural efficiency and lower costs.
VSL sklep I Ip 144/2015
Appeal dismissed; no lis pendens exists when debtor raises counterclaim in enforcement objection on notary deed.
Sklep I R 80/99
Supreme Court rejects transfer of custody case to Ljubljana due to local court backlog and speed requirements.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za sojenje se določi Okrožno sodišče v Ljubljani.

[JEDRO]

Smisel delegacije pristojnosti iz razlogov smotrnosti je predvsem v čim večji ekonomičnosti postopka. V ta okvir spada tudi težnja k čim nižjim stroškom postopka, ki so nedvomno v korelaciji s prevoznimi in drugimi stroški prihoda na sodišče, ki bremenijo udeležence postopka.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Na naroku 17. 2. 2012 sta pravdni stranki predlagali delegacijo pristojnosti sodišča zaradi ekonomičnosti. Obe stranki in njuni pooblaščenci imajo prebivališče ali sedež v Ljubljani ali pa v njeni bližini.

2. Predlog je utemeljen.

3. Vrhovno sodišče lahko tudi na predlog strank določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek.(1) Smisel tovrstne delegacije pristojnosti je predvsem v čim večji ekonomičnosti postopka. V ta okvir spada tudi težnja k čim nižjim stroškom postopka, ki so nedvomno v korelaciji s prevoznimi in drugimi stroški prihoda na sodišče, ki bremenijo udeležence postopka.

---.---

Op. št. (1): Primerjaj določbo 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP.