Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 58/2011 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2011:III.DOR.58.2011 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether the first-instance decision was based on a claim statement.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 58/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the appeal specifically concerning whether the first-instance judgment relied on a claim statement. The appellant argued that the lower court's decision lacked proper legal basis, while the opposing party contested this procedural ground. The court found the statutory conditions for admitting the appeal satisfied regarding this specific legal question and granted the review within those defined limits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure; Article 367a paragraph 3 of the Act on Civil Procedure: The Supreme Court may admit an appeal if the conditions for its admission are met regarding a specific legal issue defined in the ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure supreme court appeal admissibility claim statement procedural review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure
Article 367a paragraph 3 of the Act on Civil Procedure

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo v zadevi odločeno na podlagi sklepčne tožbe.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo v zadevi odločeno na podlagi sklepčne tožbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožbenemu zahtevku je bilo na prvi stopnji ugodeno. Pritožba tožene stranke je bila zavrnjena.

2. Predlagatelj (tožena stranka) utemeljuje svoj predlog za dopustitev revizije z večimi vprašanji.

3. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku so izpolnjeni glede pravnega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa. Vrhovno sodišče je zato revizijo v obsegu, začrtanem z navedenim vprašanjem, dopustilo.