Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 79/2011 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2011:III.DOR.79.2011 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether the first-instance decision was based on a claim statement.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 79/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia permitted the appeal specifically concerning whether the first-instance judgment relied on a claim statement. The appellant argued for broader grounds, but the court found the statutory conditions for appeal met only regarding this specific legal question. Consequently, the appeal was allowed strictly within the scope of determining the basis of the initial decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure; The Supreme Court may permit an appeal only if the conditions laid down in the first paragraph of Article 367a of the Act on Civil Procedure are met, allowing the appeal to be heard on the specific legal issue defined in the ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure appeal admissibility claim statement first instance decision Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a(1) of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL sodba Cpg 514/93
Appeal dismissed; silent acceptance of invoice does not prove legal relationship in commercial disputes.
VSL sodba II Cpg 1825/2014
Court rejects one-year statute of limitations for business building manager, allowing partial claim recovery.
VSL sodba II Cp 530/2013
Appeal dismissed; owners of unused objects without residence are exempt from waste management fees if no waste is generated.
VSL sodba II Cp 3427/2009
Appeal dismissed; legislative unconstitutionality not established merely because law was later invalidated by Constitutional Court.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 706/2016
Appeal dismissed; tenant's bathroom renovation not covered by prior landlord consent under lease terms.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo v zadevi odločeno na podlagi sklepčne tožbe.

[JEDRO]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja, ali je bilo v zadevi odločeno na podlagi sklepčne tožbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožbeni zahtevek je bil na prvi stopnji zavrnjen. Pritožbi tožeče stranke je bilo ugodeno, tako da je tožena stranka dolžna plačati vtoževano terjatev.

2. Predlagatelj (tožena stranka) utemeljuje svoj predlog za dopustitev revizije z večimi vprašanji.

3. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku so izpolnjeni glede pravnega vprašanja, opredeljenega v izreku tega sklepa. Vrhovno sodišče je zato revizijo v obsegu, začrtanem z navedenim vprašanjem dopustilo.