Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III DoR 97/2011 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2011:III.DOR.97.2011 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review request in small value commercial dispute as review is prohibited by law.

Case Number Sklep III DoR 97/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought to overturn a decision dismissing a claim for approximately 2,982 EUR, which fell under the small value commercial proceedings regime. The court ruled that Article 458(8) of the Code of Civil Procedure explicitly prohibits review in such cases, thereby precluding the Supreme Court from granting the request under Article 367(4).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 458(8) of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure: In proceedings of small value, review is not permitted, meaning the Supreme Court cannot grant a request to permit review.

Keywords

AI generated
small value proceedings commercial disputes review prohibition Code of Civil Procedure Supreme Court jurisdiction procedural limitation monetary claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 458(8) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VDSS sodba Pdp 1003/2012
Appeal dismissed; employee cannot claim money paid under non-final judgment without reserving right to restitution.
VDSS sodba Pdp 895/2013
Employer liability for workplace harassment dismissed due to lack of systematic conduct and failure to prove physical harm.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 37/2025
Appeal dismissed; employer must set work time rules in company agreement if no collective agreement exists.
VSK sklep Cp 736/2011
Appeal allowed: Small claims court must hold main hearing if facts are disputed despite written evidence sufficiency.
VSL sklep I Cp 1803/2016
Appeal court reversed first instance costs ruling by re-evaluating party success beyond claim value under ZPP Art. 154.2.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

V sporih majhne vrednosti revizija ni dovoljena, kar pomeni, da je tudi Vrhovno sodišče ne more dopustiti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. V obravnavanem postopku je tožeča stranka vtoževala terjatev iz dveh računov. Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo, da se sklep o izvršbi z dne 16. 9. 2008 razveljavi in se tožbeni zahtevek zavrne. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo.

2. Tožeča stranka je pri Vrhovnem sodišču podala predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje.

3. Gospodarski spori majhne vrednosti so spori, v katerih se tožbeni zahtevek nanaša na denarno terjatev, ki ne presega 4.000 EUR (prvi odstavek 495. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP)). Ker znaša vrednost spornega predmeta v obravnavanem primeru 2.982,32 EUR, se v postopku uporabljajo določbe o postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti.

4. V sporih majhne vrednosti revizija ni dovoljena (osmi odstavek 458. člena ZPP), kar pomeni, da je tudi Vrhovno sodišče ne more dopustiti (četrti odstavek 367. člena ZPP). Vrhovno sodišče je zato sklenilo tako, kot izhaja iz izreka sklepa.