Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cp 1205/2011 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2011:II.CP.1205.2011 AI generated

Court allows appeal to reject post-judgment dispute marking on real estate title as invalid.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cp 1205/2011
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Second Civil Department of the Supreme Court of Slovenia allowed the appeal, overturning the first-instance court's decision to permit a dispute marking on a real estate title. The appellant argued that marking a dispute after the underlying lawsuit concluded violated the principle of legal certainty, while the opposing party sought to maintain the recorded status. The court ruled that Section 79 of the Real Estate Law permits dispute markings only while a lawsuit is active, thereby invalidating the post-judgment marking and ordering the removal of related entries.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

79. člen ZZK-1; A dispute marking on a real estate title is valid only if the underlying lawsuit is still pending, as markings made after the conclusion of the proceedings are legally impermissible.

Keywords

AI generated
Real Estate Law Dispute Marking Legal Certainty Post-Judgment Marking Title Registration Supreme Court Appeal Slovenian Civil Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
79. člen ZZK-1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I. Pritožbi se ugodi in se sklep sodišča prve stopnje spremeni tako, da se predlog za zaznambo spora pri nepremičnini parc. št. 443/6 k.o. B. zavrne.

II. Dovoli se izbris vpisov, opravljenih na podlagi izpodbijanega sklepa in izbris zaznambe nepravnomočnosti sklepa o dovolitvi vpisa.

III. Pritožitelj sam krije svoje pritožbene stroške.

[JEDRO]

Iz določbe 79. člena ZZK-1 nedvomno izhaja, da je mogoče zaznambo spora pod pogoji, ki jih določa zakon, dovoliti le v primeru, da je spor v teku, ne pa po tem, ko se spor konča.