Ski resort operator not negligent under Ski Law; claim dismissed due to lack of fault.
Slovenia (SI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the first-instance judgment, upholding the decision that the ski resort operator is not liable. The plaintiff argued the operator failed its duty of care, but the court found no evidence of negligence under the Ski Law. Consequently, the operator's responsibility for the injury was not established, and the plaintiff bears their own litigation costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedZVSmuč; The operator of a ski facility is not liable for damages if they have not neglected their statutory duty of care as defined in the Ski Law.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
I. Pritožba se zavrne in se potrdi sodba sodišča prve stopnje.
II. Tožeča stranka sama krije svoje pritožbene stroške.
[JEDRO]
Ker upravljavec smučišča v konkretnem primeru ni opustil dolžne skrbnosti v smislu ZVSmuč, njegova odgovornost za nastalo škodo ni podana.