Court dismisses appeal holding new damages must be unforeseeable and unknown to both parties.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, upholding the lower court's decision to deny compensation for new damages. The plaintiff argued that unforeseen losses should be covered, but the court found that the specific damages were neither known nor predictable by either party at the time of the original judgment. Consequently, the court ruled that such damages do not qualify as compensable new losses under the applicable legal standards.