Court dismisses appeal when evidence requires guessing rather than direct proof of a specific fact.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the first-instance judgment, confirming the lower court's decision. The appellant argued that the trial court failed to properly evaluate evidence regarding a specific character string, claiming the court should have inferred facts from it. The appellate court ruled that the evidence consisted of a repeated character string from which the court could not logically deduce the alleged fact without speculation, thus failing the standard of processual evidence.