Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Up 1282/2002 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2005:I.UP.1282.2002 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal as withdrawn by parties before second instance judgment. Parties withdrew appeal and sought tax refund. Court notes withdrawal valid but tax refund belongs to first instance. Withdrawal halts proceedings. Tax refund claim rejected by Supreme Court. Withdrawal stops appeal. Tax refund claim rejected. Withdrawal valid. Tax refund claim rejected. Withdrawal stops appeal. Tax refund claim rejected.

Case Number Sklep I Up 1282/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia determined that the appellants had withdrawn their appeal before a second-instance judgment was issued. The appellants had previously lost their lawsuit against the respondent and subsequently withdrew their appeal while requesting a refund of the court fees paid. The court ruled that the withdrawal was legally effective, terminating the appeal proceedings, but declined to address the separate request for a tax refund as that matter falls under the jurisdiction of the first-instance court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 334(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 16 of the Administrative Disputes Act: A party may withdraw an appeal before the second-instance court issues a decision, thereby terminating the appeal proceedings; however, a request for the return of court fees remains within the jurisdiction of the first-instance court.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance court court fees refund jurisdictional competence administrative dispute termination of proceedings supreme court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 334(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 16 of the Administrative Disputes Act
Article 34 of the Court Fees Act
AI generated
Sodba X Ips 591/2006
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling debt maturity is a factual issue for administrative bodies to decide.
VDSS sodba Psp 214/2011
Appeal dismissed; factual error by first instance does not justify revocation under supervisory review.
VDSS sodba Psp 300/2012
Court dismisses appeal; claimant must return unemployment allowance after pension right retroactively took effect.
Sklep I Up 10/2003
Slovenian Supreme Court allows withdrawal of appeal before second instance judgment is issued.
VDSS Sodba Psp 179/2019
Appeal dismissed; unemployment agency correctly removed client from register for unexcused absence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da sta tožeči stranki V.M. in I.M. umaknili pritožbo.

[JEDRO]

Po določbi 2. odstavka 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Ur.l. RS, št. 36/2004 - uradno prečiščeno besedilo, ZPP), ki se po določbi 16. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (Ur.l. RS, št. 50/97 in 70/2000, ZUS) primerno uporablja za vprašanja, ki jih ZUS ne ureja, lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler o njej sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijano sodbo z dne 5.9.2002, je sodišče prve stopnje zavrnilo tožbo tožečih strank zoper odločbo tožene stranke z dne 26.2.2001. Zoper navedeno sodbo sta le tožeči stranki vložili pritožbo, ki pa sta jo umaknili z vlogo z dne 3.1.2005. Hkrati sta predlagali, da se jima vrne plačana sodna taksa.

Po določbi 2. odstavka 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Uradni list RS, št. 36/2004 - uradno prečiščeno besedilo, ZPP), ki se po določbi 16. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (Uradni list RS, št. 50/97 in 70/2000, ZUS) primerno uporablja za vprašanja, ki jih ZUS ne ureja, lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler o njej sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe.

Ker o pritožbi tožečih strank vrhovno sodišče kot sodišče druge stopnje še ni odločilo, je na podlagi navedenih določb ZPP in ZUS ugotovilo, da je pritožba umaknjena. S tem je pritožbeni postopek ustavljen.

O zahtevi za vrnitev taks pritožbeno sodišče ni odločalo, ker je za to prisojno sodišče prve stopnje (34. člen Zakona o sodnih taksah, Uradni list RS, št. 20/2004).