Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Pr 52/93 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1993:I.PR.52.93 AI generated

Supreme Court allows transfer of appeal to another court due to judge's familial relation to appellant.

Case Number Sklep I Pr 52/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia granted the request to transfer the appeal to a different competent court. The appellant and respondent challenged a land registry decision, but the appeal would normally be heard by the High Court in X, where the appellant's husband serves as a judge. The court ruled that this familial relationship constitutes a significant ground for transferring the case to another High Court to ensure impartiality.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68 of the Act on Civil Procedure; A familial relationship between the appellant and a judge of the court hearing the appeal constitutes a significant ground for transferring the case to another competent court.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure judicial impartiality transfer of jurisdiction family relation land registry dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
Sklep II DoR 454/2010
Supreme Court allows review on land registry statute of limitations and preclusion periods for void contracts.
Sodba II Ips 179/2005
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, upholding nullity of a contract for sale and repurchase due to lack of notarization.
VSC Sodba Cp 374/2020
Appeal dismissed; State's 1993 land acquisition precludes later invalid gift deed effects.
VSRS Sodba II Ips 270/2015
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; ownership registration invalid due to lack of co-ownership basis in underlying contract.
VSK sklep CDn 26/2016
Appeal dismissed; court upheld refusal to register life tenancy right due to missing deed clause. The court rejected the argument that a prior deed was sufficient without a specific land registry clause. The decision emphasizes strict adherence to the Land Registry Act's requirements for registration. The court found the appeal arguments were not substantiated by the facts. The ruling clarifies that a contract alone does not satisfy statutory registration conditions. The court maintained the first instance decision as legally correct. The outcome reinforces the necessity of explicit registry clauses. The judgment stands firm against the appellants' claims. The legal principle of strict compliance is upheld. The decision prevents automatic registration based on contracts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ugodi in se za odločanje na drugi stopnji določi kot pristojno sodišče Višje sodišče v Y.

[JEDRO]

Okoliščina, da je pritožničin mož sodnik sodišča, ki bi moralo odločati o pritožbi, predstavlja tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča, ki bo odločalo na drugi stopnji.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

V tej zemljiškoknjižni zadevi je Temeljno sodišče v ... enota v ... ugodilo predlogu Občine ... za poočitev sprememb pri vl.št. 50 s sklepom z dne 16.3.1993,. Proti temu sklepu sta se pritožila A in B. O pritožbi bi moralo odločati Višje sodišče v X, ki je predlagalo, da se za reševanje pritožbe določi drugo višje sodišče, ker je pritožnica žena sodnika Višjega sodišča v X.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 68.čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije kot najvišje redno sodišče v državi določi, naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče z njegovega območja, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Okoliščina, da je pritožničin mož sodnik sodišča, ki bi moralo odločati o pritožbi, predstavlja tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča, ki bo odločalo na drugi stopnji. Zato je vrhovno sodišče predlogu ugodilo.