Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Up 10/2003 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:I.UP.10.2003 AI generated

Slovenian Supreme Court allows withdrawal of appeal before second instance judgment is issued.

Case Number Sklep I Up 10/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the first-instance judgment on 27 November 2002. The plaintiff subsequently withdrew the appeal via a filing received by the Administrative Court on 19 September 2003. The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal, ruling that the procedural process was validly terminated before a second-instance decision could be rendered.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku 2. odstavek 334. člen; Zakon o upravnem sporu 1. odstavek 59. člen: A party may withdraw an already filed appeal at any time before the court of second instance issues a decision, thereby terminating the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance procedure administrative litigation termination of proceedings plaintiff's right procedural timeline supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o pravdnem postopku 2. odstavek 334. člen
Zakon o upravnem sporu 1. odstavek 59. člen
AI generated
Sodba X Ips 493/2006
Supreme Court dismisses review of administrative court ruling on construction permit for wide walking paths.
VDSS Sodba Psp 116/2018
Social court dismisses appeal; mandatory pension insurance applies to company partners/managers absent employment contracts.
VDSS sodba Psp 300/2012
Court dismisses appeal; claimant must return unemployment allowance after pension right retroactively took effect.
Sodba X Ips 722/2004
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance ruling on child contact arrangements based on social work reports.
VDSS Sodba Psp 429/2018
Appeal dismissed; employer correctly reduced pension due to mandatory insurance status as company director.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožeča stranka pritožbo zoper sodbo Upravnega sodišča Republike Slovenije v Ljubljani, št. U 1888/2001-9 z dne 9.10.2002, umaknila.

[JEDRO]

Dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe, lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pravno sredstvo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijano sodbo je sodišče prve stopnje na podlagi 1. odstavka 59. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (Uradni list RS, št. 50/97 in 70/00 - v nadaljevanju ZUS) zavrnilo tožničino tožbo zoper odločbo tožene stranke z dne 7.9.2001. Proti sodbi sodišča prve stopnje, št. U 1888/2001 z dne 9.10.2002, je tožnica dne 27.11.2002 vložila pritožbo. Z vlogo z dne 19.9.2003, katero je Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije v Ljubljani prejelo dne 26.9.2003, je tožnica vloženo pritožbo umaknila.

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 - ZPP), ki se po določbi 16. člena ZUS primerno uporablja za vsa vprašanja, ki niso urejena s tem zakonom, v 2. odstavku 334. člena določa, da lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe. Pritožbeno sodišče o pritožbi tožnice še ni odločalo, zato je po umiku pritožbe, na podlagi navedene določbe ZPP, pritožbeni postopek ustavilo.