Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 290/93 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1993:II.IPS.290.93 AI generated

Inheritance law review rejected as statutory review procedure not provided for in inheritance law.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 290/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the review filed by testamentary heirs against a second-instance court's inheritance ruling. The heirs argued for fundamental procedural violations and misapplication of substantive law, seeking to have the lower court's decision revoked. The court ruled that the Inheritance Act does not provide for a review procedure, and since the Civil Procedure Act generally prohibits review for non-contentious proceedings unless specified otherwise, the review was inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o dedovanju; Zakon o nepravdnem postopku: Review is not permitted as an extraordinary legal remedy in inheritance proceedings unless explicitly provided by law.

Keywords

AI generated
inheritance proceedings review inadmissible non-contentious proceedings testamentary heirs statutory procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o dedovanju (Ur.l. SRS, št. 15/76 in 23/78)
Zakon o nepravdnem postopku, 34.čl.
AI generated
VSL Sklep II Cp 1464/2020
Appeal dismissed because the guardian is not an heir and lacks standing to contest inheritance proceedings.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1431/2024
Appeal allowed; heirs can submit evidence until inheritance ruling finalizes.
VSL sklep I Cp 846/2010
Inheritance of denationalized property: explicit will controls over statutory succession rules.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1162/2017
Court allows inheritance of newly found property to original heir's heirs when original heir is deceased. New property distributed per prior inheritance ruling.
VSK sklep I Cp 448/2004
Inheritance court allows appeal, remands case to determine if a life annuity contract was a revocable gift.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

V Zakonu o dedovanju (Ur.l. SRS, št. 15/76 in 23/78), ki ureja zapuščinski postopek, revizija kot izredno pravno sredstvo ni predvidena in zato tudi ni dovoljena. Za nepravdne postopke pa velja določba 34.čl. Zakona o nepravdnem postopku, po kateri revizija ni dovoljena, razen če zakon določa drugače.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je s sklepom o dedovanju ugotovilo obseg zapustničinega premoženja in vsebino njene oporoke. Za dediča na podlagi oporoke je razglasilo x in y, vsakega do 3/8 zapuščine, na podlagi zakona pa zapustničinega brata z do 2/8 zapuščine. Pritožbo oporočnih dedičev proti temu sklepu je sodišče druge stopnje zavrnilo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

Proti sklepu sodišča druge stopnje sta vložila oporočna dediča revizijo, v kateri uveljavljata revizijska razloga bistvene kršitve določb pravdnega postopka in zmotne uporabe materialnega prava. Predlagata, da revizijsko sodišče sklepa sodišč prve in druge stopnje razveljavi in zadevo vrne sodišču prve stopnje v novo odločanje.

Revizija ni dovoljena.

V Zakonu o dedovanju (Ur.l. SRS, št. 15/76 in 23/78), ki ureja zapuščinski postopek, revizija kot izredno pravno sredstvo ni predvidena in zato tudi ni dovoljena. Za nepravdne postopke pa velja določba 34.čl. Zakona o nepravdnem postopku, po kateri revizija ni dovoljena, razen če zakon določa drugače.

Iz navedenega razloga je revizijsko sodišče zavrglo revizijo kot nedovoljeno.