Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep U 13/94 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1995:U.13.94 AI generated

Administrative court dismisses lawsuit as untimely filed after statutory 30-day service deadline expired.

Case Number Sklep U 13/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia dismissed the plaintiff's administrative lawsuit for being filed after the statutory limitation period. The plaintiff submitted the suit on January 5, 1994, yet the contested administrative decision was officially served on November 10, 1993, creating a gap exceeding the required 30 days. The court ruled that the legislation must be applied sensibly in accordance with the Constitutional Act on the Implementation of the Fundamental Constitutional Charter, thereby rejecting the late filing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 24 of the Act on Administrative Disputes; Article 30 of the Act on Administrative Disputes: A lawsuit filed after the expiration of the thirty-day period following service of the administrative act is rejected at any stage of the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative dispute statutory limitation period service of decision untimely filing Constitutional Act supreme court procedural deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 24 of the Act on Administrative Disputes
Article 30 of the Act on Administrative Disputes
Article 1, Paragraph 4 of the Constitutional Act on the Implementation of the Fundamental Constitutional Charter
AI generated
Sklep I Up 895/99
Administrative court dismisses appeal for late filing of lawsuit due to proven service date.
Sklep I Up 1003/2002
Appeal dismissed; service on counsel counts as service on client; re-service does not restart statute of limitations.
Sodba U 1598/93-5
Court dismisses claim that a late-issued title award has retroactive effect, ruling it is constitutive and effective only from issuance date.
Sklep I Up 644/2002
Administrative court dismissed appeal due to late filing of lawsuit exceeding 30-day statutory deadline.
Sodba I Up 332/2000
Appeal dismissed; renewal of procedure claim barred by missed one-month subjective deadline under ZUP.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Tožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Prepozno vloženo tožbo sodišče zavrže v kateremkoli stadiju postopka (1. točka 1. odstavka v zvezi z 2. odstavkom 30. člena zakona o upravnih sporih).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožnik je dne 5.1.1994 vložil pri tem sodišču tožbo proti odločbi tožene stranke št. 131-1/92-SŠ-1386 z dne 1.9.1993. S to odločbo je bil tožniku podeljen naziv mentor z veljavnostjo od izdaje odločbe dalje.

Sodišče je moralo tožbo kot prepozno vloženo zavreči.

Po določbi 24. člena zakona o upravnih sporih se tožba v upravnem sporu vloži v 30 dneh potem, ko je bil upravni akt, ki se s tožbo izpodbija, vročen stranki. Iz poštne povratnice, ki je med upravnimi spisi, je razvidno, da je bila izpodbijana odločba vročena tožniku 10.11.1993, tožnik pa je tožbo oddal v vložišču Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije 5.1.1994. Tožba je bila torej vložena po preteku 30 dnevnega roka. Prepozno vloženo tožbo sodišče po določbah 30. člena zakona o upravnih sporih zavrže v kateremkoli stadiju postopka (1. točka 1. odstavka v zvezi z 2. odstavkom 30. člena zakona o upravnih sporih). Zakon o upravnih sporih je sodišče skladno s 1. odstavkom 4. člena ustavnega zakona za izvedbo temeljne ustavne listine o samostojnosti in neodvisnosti Republike Slovenije (Uradni list RS, št. 1/91-I) smiselno uporabilo kot republiški predpis.