Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 34/2008 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:I.R.34.2008 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to Ljubljana because the defendant is a judge of the Kopre court.

Case Number Sklep I R 34/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia transferred jurisdiction from the Kopre High Court to the Ljubljana High Court. The defendant was identified as a judge within the Kopre court's department, which the opposing party argued constituted a significant reason for the transfer. The court upheld this argument, ruling that the defendant's position as a judge of the originating court necessitated the change of venue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; When the defendant is a judge of the court of the High Court, jurisdiction must be transferred to another High Court.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction judge as defendant High Court venue procedural transfer Zakon o pravdnem postopku

Cited Legislation

AI generated
67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlogu Višjega sodišča v Kopru ugodilo in pristojnost za odločanje o pritožbi preneslo na Višje sodišče v Ljubljani (67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - Ur.
AI generated
Sklep I R 55/2008
Supreme Court dismisses request for court transfer based on vague bias claims without specific evidence.
VSRS Sklep I R 24/2026
Okrajno sodišče v Kopru je na Vrhovno sodišče RS poslalo predlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča po 67.
VSK Sodba in sklep Cpg 15/2023
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on share acquisition and apparent contract validity under ZGD-1.
Sklep I R 187/2007
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses debt transfer request based on vague corruption allegations against court staff.
VSK sodba Cpg 127/2014
Court dismisses plaintiff appeal, ruling bank not liable for investment losses due to investor negligence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za sojenje v tej zadevi se določi Višje sodišče v Ljubljani.

[JEDRO]

Dejstvo, da je toženec mož ene od sodnic višjega sodišča, predstavlja tehten razlog za prenos pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Krajevno pristojno Višje sodišče v Kopru predlaga prenos pristojnosti na drugo višje sodišče, ker je toženec mož ene od sodnic ... oddelka tega sodišča.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Dejstvo, da je toženec mož ene od sodnic Višjega sodišča v Kopru, predstavlja tehten razlog za prenos pristojnosti. Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlogu Višjega sodišča v Kopru ugodilo in pristojnost za odločanje o pritožbi preneslo na Višje sodišče v Ljubljani (67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in nasl.).