Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 31/2008 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:I.R.31.2008 AI generated

Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses delegation request based solely on party dissatisfaction with proceedings.

Case Number Sklep I R 31/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected a request for case delegation filed by a party dissatisfied with the court's handling of the proceedings. The applicant argued that the court failed to rule correctly and relied on an unhelpful expert opinion, yet the court found no legal basis for transferring jurisdiction. The decision establishes that mere dissatisfaction with the conduct of the trial cannot constitute a valid reason for delegating a case to another court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; Delegation of proceedings is permitted only when it is evident that the matter will be handled more easily or for other significant reasons, and a party's dissatisfaction with the conduct of the proceedings cannot serve as a ground for such delegation.

Keywords

AI generated
delegation of proceedings Supreme Court jurisdiction party dissatisfaction ZPP Article 67 case transfer grounds

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VSRS Sklep I R 188/2019
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to a different court due to a judge's employment there creating impartiality concerns.
Sklep I R 53/2007
Supreme Court transfers case to Ljubljana court due to spouse of plaintiff working there as clerk.
VSRS Sklep I R 20/2020
Supreme Court dismisses delegation request based solely on party dissatisfaction with lower court decisions.
Sklep I R 57/2007
Supreme Court dismisses transfer request when employee works at court but no impartiality doubt exists.
VSRS Sklep I R 160/2024
Dissatisfaction with court performance alone does not justify transferring jurisdiction under Slovenian procedural law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Nezadovoljstvo udeleženke z vodenjem sodnega postopka v nobenem primeru ne more predstavljati razloga za delegacijo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Nasprotna udeleženka je predlagala delegacijo v okviru določb 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP, ker po njenem mnenju "Okrajno sodišče v B. ne more konkretne nepravdne zadeve razsoditi na zakonit in pravilen način". Do takšnega spoznanja naj bi udeleženka prišla zato, ker naj bi sodišče naložilo vsebinsko odločitev o zadevi izvedencu A.A., ta pa naj bi podal povsem neuporabno izvedensko mnenje.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

2. Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog udeleženca v postopku določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi(1). Nezadovoljstvo udeleženke z vodenjem sodnega postopka v nobenem primeru ne more predstavljati razloga za delegacijo.

----.----

Op. št. (1): Primerjaj 67. člen ZPP v zvezi s 37. členom Zakona o nepravdnem postopku - ZNP.