Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 193/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:I.R.193.2007 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses transfer request based solely on general threats without concrete procedural justification.

Case Number Sklep I R 193/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the plaintiff's request to transfer the case to a different court. The plaintiff argued for a transfer to Murska Sobota citing threats of harm if they appeared in Kranj, while the lower court had previously dismissed the lawsuit due to procedural inaction. The court ruled that general threats alone do not constitute a valid reason for judicial delegation, requiring clear evidence of procedural difficulty or other significant grounds.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku; Posplošene trditve o grožnjah nasprotne stranke v nobenem primeru ne predstavljajo razloga za delegacijo sodišča, saj mora biti prenos utemeljen le z očitno lažjo opravljanjem postopka ali drugimi tehtnimi razlogi.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial delegation court transfer procedural objection threats as grounds jurisdictional transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP
(1): Primerjaj 67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP.
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cpg 499/2013
Appeal dismissed; lawyer's address error does not excuse court hearing absence under ZPP.
VDS sklep Psp 78/2000
Appeal dismissed; appeal barred by four-month silence after process suspension under ZPP provisions.
VDSS sklep Pdp 679/2015
Appeal court reversed first instance, rejecting creditor's claim for litigation costs due to bankruptcy non-claim.
VDS sklep Pdp 639/99
Appeal dismissed; lawsuit terminated due to plaintiff's failure to identify defendant within statutory time limits.
Sklep II Ips 465/2000
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding procedural silence where claim deemed withdrawn due to lack of continuation proposal within statutory period.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Posplošene trditve o grožnjah nasprotne stranke v nobenem primeru ne predstavljajo razloga za delegacijo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Krajevno pristojno Okrožno sodišče v Kranju je dne 24.10.2006 sprejelo sklep, da je tožba umaknjena, ker tožnik ni pravočasno predlagal nadaljevanja postopka potem, ko je nastopilo mirovanje.

2. Tožnik je dne 27.11.2006 z vlogo predlagal vrnitev v prejšnje stanje (o katerem odloča pristojno sodišče prve stopnje). Istočasno je predlagal, "da se postopek prenese na pristojno sodišče v Murski Soboti", ker je toženec grozil, da se bo tožniku "nekaj" zgodilo, če se bo pojavil na kranjskem sodišču.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

3. Predlog stranke za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča, da postopa v zadevi, je utemeljen le, če je očitno, da se bo tako lažje opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi(1). Posplošene trditve o grožnjah nasprotne stranke v nobenem primeru ne predstavljajo razloga za delegacijo. Zato je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.

Op. št. (1): Primerjaj 67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP.