Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I Up 219/2008 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:I.UP.219.2008 AI generated

Administrative court halts proceedings when plaintiff withdraws appeal before final judgment in Slovenian administrative litigation.

Case Number Sklep I Up 219/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The first-instance court dismissed the plaintiff's administrative lawsuit and denied cost claims, prompting an appeal that the plaintiff subsequently withdrew. The Supreme Court ruled that the withdrawal of the appeal before a final decision renders the appeal proceedings terminated. Consequently, the court halted the administrative procedure as the legal basis for continuing the case no longer existed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o upravnem sporu; Zakon o pravdnem postopku: If a party withdraws an appeal before the appellate court issues a decision, the appeal proceedings are deemed terminated and the administrative procedure must be halted.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal withdrawal termination of proceedings supreme court ruling administrative litigation halt plaintiff withdrawal effect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
22. člen Zakona o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1)
2. odstavek 334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP – UPB3)
2. odstavek 14. člen Zakona o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1)
AI generated
VDS sklep Pdp 1325/2003
Appeal dismissed; procedural protection for termination does not extend to scheduling decisions via analogy.
VSM sklep I Ip 425/2015
Appeal dismissed; court upheld enforcement rejection due to insufficient substantiation of creditor's claim structure.
VDSS Sklep Pdp 309/2017
Appeal against a retrial request is dismissed because the appellant filed it personally without proving a barista license.
VDSS Sklep Psp 170/2022
Appeal court allows review of administrative decision rejected for missing one-month subjective renewal deadline.
VSL sklep II Cp 2171/2006
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by failing to assess defendant's mental capacity when calculating appeal deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Postopek se ustavi.

[JEDRO]

Če pritožnik pritožbo umakne, sodišče postopek ustavi.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje zavrglo tožničino tožbo zoper odločbo tožene stranke z dne 28.11.2000 (1. točka izreka izpodbijanega sklepa), zavrnilo pa je tudi zahtevo tožnice za povrnitev stroškov postopka (2. točka izreka).

Zoper navedeni sklep je tožnica vložila pritožbo, ki pa jo je z dopisom z dne 16.5.2008 umaknila.

Po določbi 1. odstavka 22. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1, Ur. l. RS, št. 105/06 in 26/07 – sklep US) se v upravnem sporu za vprašanje postopka, ki v ZUS-1 niso urejena, primerno uporabljajo določbe Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP – UPB3, Ur. l. RS, št. 73/07). Na podlagi 2. odstavka 334. člena ZPP – UPB3 lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče ne izda odločbe. Ker o pritožbi tožeče stranke v tej zadevi pritožbeno sodišče še ni odločilo, je zaradi umika pritožbe šteti, da je pritožbeni postopek ustavljen. V tej zadevi je odločal sodnik posameznik na podlagi 2. odstavka 14. člena ZUS-1.