Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 52/2007 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2007:I.R.52.2007 AI generated

Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses transfer of jurisdiction request based solely on plaintiff's subjective distrust of the judge.

Case Number Sklep I R 52/2007
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the plaintiff's request to transfer jurisdiction to a different court. The plaintiff argued for the transfer due to a loss of trust in the Maribor District Court and the presiding judge, citing a criminal complaint against her. The court ruled that subjective dissatisfaction with a judge's performance cannot serve as a valid ground for transferring jurisdiction under Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure; Subjective dissatisfaction with a judge's conduct or the court's performance cannot constitute a valid ground for transferring jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction loss of trust subjective assessment civil procedure presiding judge criminal complaint Slovenia

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
Sklep I Ips 362/2008
Supreme Court dismisses victim's request for legality protection as they lack standing as a prosecutor.
VSM Sklep I Kr 19194/2020
Court transfers criminal case jurisdiction to ensure fair trial appearance when defendant sues the court itself.
Sodba I Ips 1353/2012-48
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for restoration of proceedings due to lack of recusal grounds and untimely objection.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 235/2023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal by non-lawyer plaintiff and deems second appeal withdrawn due to unpaid court fees.
VSRS Sklep I R 85/2023
Supreme Court delegates jurisdiction to Maribor court based on economic efficiency and witness location.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se ne ugodi.

[JEDRO]

Subjektivna ocena stranke o delu sodišča ne more biti podlaga za prenos pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožnik predlaga prenos pristojnosti na podlagi 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 in nasl. - ZPP), predlog pa utemeljuje z izgubo zaupanja v Okrožno sodišče v Mariboru, zlasti v sodnico A. A., ki vodi ta postopek. Zoper njo je vložil tudi kazensko ovadbo zaradi suma, da je storila kaznivo dejanje zlorabe uradnega položaja ali uradnih pravic.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Nezaupanje stranke v konkretnega sodnika ne more biti podlaga za prenos pristojnosti, tudi ne, če je zoper tega sodnika vložila kazensko ovadbo. Po določbi 67. člena ZPP lahko namreč vrhovno sodišče na predlog pristojnega sodišča ali stranke določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Razlogi za tako delegacijo so torej ekonomičnost postopka ali okoliščine v sferi sodišča, subjektivna ocena stranke o delu sodišču pa ne more biti podlaga za prenos pristojnosti.