Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 750/2006 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2007:II.IPS.750.2006 AI generated

Appeal rejected because no appeal exists for contact arrangements between parents and children under Slovenian law.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 750/2006
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the appeal filed by a parent against a lower court's order regarding supervised contact between a minor child and the other parent. The lower court established a specific schedule for supervised visits at a social center, which the opposing party contested, but the first-instance court upheld its decision. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because the Law on Civil Procedure does not provide for an appeal mechanism in proceedings concerning contact arrangements between parents and children.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

34. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku; 377. člen v zvezi s 384. členom in 37. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku: In proceedings regarding contact between parents and children, an appeal is not permitted unless the law provides otherwise; therefore, such appeals are inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
contact arrangements parent child relations supervised visits civil procedure appeal inadmissible appeal minor child protection social center supervision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
34. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku
V nepravdnem postopku revizija ni dovoljena, razen če zakon določa drugače (34. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku - Uradni list SRS, št.
377. člen v zvezi s 384. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku
37. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sklep IV Cp 2096/2009
Appeal dismissed; custody contact rules and costs in parent-child disputes follow child's best interest and success principle.
VSL sklep IV Cp 596/2013
Appeal dismissed; temporary custody orders in parental disputes require urgent child protection measures despite procedural complaints.
VSC Sklep I Cp 39/2024
Appeal dismissed; temporary custody order upheld due to proven risk of child removal from foster care.
Sodba in sklep II Ips 1268/2008
Supreme Court dismisses request for legality protection regarding flexible child visitation schedules based on parental communication.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 1526/2021
Appeal allowed; court ordered new trial when first instance failed to gather sufficient evidence for interim order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

V postopku urejanja stikov med starši in otroki revizija ni dovoljena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je uredilo način izvrševanja stikov med mladoletno G. J. in predlagateljem in sicer tako, da ti potekajo pod nadzorom strokovnega delavca pri Centru za socialno delo ... vsak torek in petek od 13.00 ure do 15.00 ure. Nasprotni udeleženki je naložilo, da mora te stike omogočiti.

Pritožbeno sodišče je zavrnilo pritožbo nasprotne udeleženke in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

Zoper ta sklep je nasprotna udeleženka vložila revizijo zaradi bistvenih kršitev določb postopka ter zmotne uporabe materialnega prava.

Revizija ni dovoljena.

V nepravdnem postopku revizija ni dovoljena, razen če zakon določa drugače (34. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku - Uradni list SRS, št. 30/86 in nasl. - ZNP). In ker za postopke urejanja stikov med starši in otroki zakon ne predvideva revizije, je ta nedovoljena. Zato jo je revizijsko sodišče zavrglo (377. člen v zvezi s četrtim odstavkom 384. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 in nasl., v zvezi s 37. členom ZNP).