Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Sodba II Ips 490/2004 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2006:II.IPS.490.2004 AI generated

Unfair negotiations breach good faith principles but do not cause foreseeable lost profit damages.

Case Number Sodba II Ips 490/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's appeal against the dismissal of a claim for damages arising from unfair negotiations. The applicant argued that the respondent's refusal to sign a representation agreement, after promising to do so, caused him to miss a lawsuit that would have secured a permanent employment contract and future income. The court acknowledged the breach of good faith principles but held that the respondent could not foresee or reasonably expect such a distant and extraordinary consequence, thus lacking the necessary causal link for lost profit damages.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

30. člen ZOR; 12., 13., 16. člen ZOR; 378. člen ZPP; 189. člen ZOR; Unfair negotiations constitute a breach of good faith and abuse of rights, triggering general liability rules, but damages are limited to foreseeable consequences, excluding highly remote and unpredictable losses.

Keywords

AI generated
unfair negotiations good faith principle abuse of rights causal link foreseeability of damage lost profit damages ZOR provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Nepoštena pogajanja pomenijo kršitev načel vestnosti in poštenja, prepovedi zlorabe pravic in prepovedi povzročanja škode. Kršitev teh načel terja uporabo splošnih pravil odškodninske odgovornosti, torej tudi priznavanje izgubljenega dobička. Ni pa prezreti pravil o vzročni zvezi in predvidljivosti škode.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]