Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 78/2006 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2006:II.IPS.78.2006 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal as valid since court had not yet ruled on the appeal.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 78/2006
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia declared the withdrawal of the appeal valid because the appellate court had not yet made a decision on the appeal itself. The appellant had previously lost a first-instance lawsuit regarding co-ownership and damages, prompting the appeal, which was subsequently withdrawn by the appellant on April 19, 2006. Since the appellate court had not yet deliberated or ruled on the appeal, the withdrawal was legally effective and the appeal was dismissed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 383. v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. člena: If an appellant withdraws an appeal before the appellate court has made a decision on it, the withdrawal is valid and the appeal is deemed withdrawn.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal validity of withdrawal pre-decision withdrawal appellate procedure Zakon o pravdnem postopku

Cited Legislation

AI generated
383. v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Revizijsko sodišče o vloženi reviziji še ni odločalo, zato je ugotovilo njen umik (383. v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, Uradni list RS, št.
AI generated
VSL sodba II Cp 348/2015
Court dismisses claim for ownership based on good faith possession when possessor knew of defects.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1444/2023
Appellant dismissed for failing to prove good faith regarding large undeclared land parcel ownership.
VSL sodba II Cp 691/2013
Appeal dismissed; claim for land registration rejected as ill-defined under Land Register Act.
sodba II Ips 452/92
Appeal dismissed; 1/3 joint contribution to property entitles spouse to real right claim, not just contractual.
VSL sodba in sklep II Cp 1814/93
Physical labor alone on a spouse's farm does not create co-ownership of real estate without significant value increase.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Ker je revident umaknil revizijo pred odločanjem o reviziji, je revizijsko sodišče ugotovilo njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek na ugotovitev, da je tožena stranka solastnik nepremičnine parc. št. 632/1 in 632/2 k.o. K., pri čemer znaša solastninski delež tožeče stranke 60 %, in podrejeni tožbeni zahtevek na plačilo 9.142.731,00 SIT, valoriziran po cenah na dan izdaje sodbe sodišča prve stopnje, z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

Zoper tako pravnomočno sodbo je tožeča stranka vložila pravočasno revizijo.

Revizija je bila vročena toženi stranki in Vrhovnemu državnemu tožilstvu Republike Slovenije.

S pisno vlogo, ki je na sodišče prispela 19.4.2006, je tožeča stranka umaknila vloženo revizijo.

Revizijsko sodišče o vloženi reviziji še ni odločalo, zato je ugotovilo njen umik (383. v zvezi z drugim odstavkom 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, Uradni list RS, št. 36/04 - prečiščeno besedilo).