Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 33/2006 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2006:I.R.33.2006 AI generated

Claims of relatives dining in court building do not constitute grounds for case delegation.

Case Number Sklep I R 33/2006
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The plaintiff requested case delegation to another court, arguing that the defendant had a familial relationship with the tenant of a dining facility located within the court building. The Supreme Court rejected this request, noting that mere assertions of such a connection, even if proven, do not objectively undermine the court's impartiality. Consequently, the court held that these circumstances fail to meet the statutory threshold for delegating proceedings under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; Mere claims of relatives dining in the court building do not constitute a significant reason for case delegation.

Keywords

AI generated
case delegation court impartiality ZPP 67 significant reason objective impartiality familial relationship court building

Cited Legislation

AI generated
67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP
Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog stranke določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi (67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP).
AI generated
VSRS Sklep I R 23/2025
Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to law clerk's employment by opposing counsel.
Sklep I R 5/2008
Court transfers case to another court when a party works there and the small court lacks sufficient independence.
Sklep I R 152/2012
Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction request based on judge's acquaintance with plaintiff under ZPP Art. 67.
VSRS Sklep I R 196/2018
Supreme Court dismisses jurisdiction objection when a party is a judge at the hearing court due to impartiality doubts.
VSRS Sklep I R 23/2016
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to Maribor due to the presiding judge being a party to the lawsuit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Zgolj postavljanje trditev o sorodstvenih vezeh ene od strank z najemnikom gostinskega lokala v stavbi sodišča, v nobenem primeru ne predstavlja tehtnega razloga za delegacijo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožnika utemeljujeta predlog za delegacijo s trditvijo, da je toženka v sorodstvenem razmerju z najemnikom gostinskega lokala v sodni stavbi. Ker naj bi se v tem lokalu prehranjevali tudi sodniki, naj bi bil podan dvom v nepristranskost sodišča kot institucije.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog stranke določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi (67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP). Zgolj postavljanje trditev o sorodstvenih vezeh ene od strank z najemnikom gostinskega lokala v stavbi sodišča, v nobenem primeru ne predstavlja tehtnega razloga za delegacijo. Četudi bi predlagatelja svoje trditve dokazno podprla, pa zatrjevana dejstva ne morejo predstavljati relevantne podlage za dvom v objektivno nepristranskost sodišča.