Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 102/2005 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2005:I.R.102.2005 AI generated

Court rejects delegation of jurisdiction request as personal conflict probability does not automatically trigger Article 67 ZPP.

Case Number Sklep I R 102/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to delegate jurisdiction to a different court under Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act. The applicant argued that a specific judge should recuse herself due to past professional collaboration with the defendant, creating a personal conflict. The court held that the mere probability of such a conflict within a single court's department does not automatically necessitate a transfer of jurisdiction to another court. Consequently, the request was dismissed because the statutory threshold for delegation was not met by the circumstances described.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; The probability of a judge's recusal within a specific court's department does not automatically constitute a ground for determining a different competent court.

Keywords

AI generated
delegation of jurisdiction personal conflict recusal of judge competent court Civil Procedure Act judicial independence procedural efficiency

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
Sklep I R 50/2006
Supreme Court transfers case to another court due to potential bias from a judge's familial ties and dual role.
VSRS Sklep I R 155/2021
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to ensure impartiality when creditor's brother works at the same court as enforcement officer.
VSRS Sklep III R 34/2016
Appeal dismissed: Same judge leading bankruptcy and related litigation does not automatically violate impartiality rights.
VSRS Sklep I R 51/2024
Supreme Court transfers civil case jurisdiction from Ljubljana to Celje due to perceived lack of impartiality.
VSM Sklep I Kr 65979/2019
Court transfers criminal case to different district court due to perceived lack of judicial impartiality.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Verjetnost, da bo predlagana izločitev sodnikov posameznega oddelka določenega sodišča, praviloma ne predstavlja predpostavke za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča po 67. členu ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrajno sodišče v A. je predlagalo "delegacijo pristojnosti po 67. členu ZPP", ker je tožena stranka višja sodnica Višjega sodišča v A. in je nekoč delala na pravdnem oddelku tedanjega Temeljnega sodišča v A., Enote v A., zaradi česar so nekateri sodniki pravdnega oddelka Okrajnega sodišča v A. z njo sodelovali. Sodnica je tudi sodelovala v projektu reševanja sodnih zaostankov na pravdnem oddelku predlagatelja, nekateri na oddelku zaposleni sodniki pa jo poznajo, ker so delali kot strokovni sodelavci na Višjem sodišču v A. Zaradi navedenih okoliščin bi zato sodniki pravdnega oddelka predlagatelja lahko predlagali svojo izločitev. Stališče predlagatelja je, da bi se postopek očitno opravil lažje in hitreje, če bi bila zadeva delegirana drugemu sodišču.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Verjetnost, da bo predlagana izločitev sodnikov posameznega oddelka določenega sodišča, praviloma ne predstavlja predpostavke za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku. Posebej to velja za sodišča z relativno velikim številom sodnikov, torej tudi za Okrajno sodišče v A.