Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 5948/2012 AI generated

Transfer motion moot after underlying case decided; request denied

Case Number Încheierea nr. 5948/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) dismissed the motion to transfer case file no. 7540/318/2010 from the Târgu-Jiu District Court, filed by the petitioner company, ruling that the request had become moot because the underlying case had already been decided on 6 September 2012, as confirmed by the petitioner's own letter of 1 October 2012. The court acted on the procedural doctrine that a transfer motion is pointless once the case is resolved, and the dismissal is final with no appeal available.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 66 C.pr.civ; Transfer motion moot after underlying case decided; request denied: 7540/318/2010 from the Târgu-Jiu District Court, filed by the petitioner company, ruling that the request had become moot because the underlying case had already been decided on 6 September 2012, as confirmed by the petitioner's own letter of 1 October 2012. The court acted on the procedural doctrine that a transfer motion is pointless once the case is resolved, and the dismissal is final with no appeal available.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot civil judgment withdrawal of legal petition decisions concerning reassignment or transfer real estate transfer transfer of custody
AI generated
ICCJ_91075
Transfer request moot after underlying case decided; motion rejected.
ICCJ_110622
Transfer motion rejected as moot after underlying case resolved.
ICCJ_102157
Transfer request rejected as moot after underlying case decided
ICCJ_99819
Transfer motion rejected as moot after underlying case resolved; original judgment stands
ICCJ_94030
Transfer motion moot after underlying case resolved; transfer request rejected and adjournment denied.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 66 C.pr.civ.

The dispositive rejects the request for transfer of the case, a decision based on the procedural grounds for transfer requests.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea a fost legal timbrată.

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost judecat la 6 septembrie 2012, acest aspect reieșind și din adresa din 1 octombrie 2012, prin care petenta a solicitat respingerea cererii de strămutare ca fiind rămasă fără obiect, întrucât cauza a fost soluționată.

Având cuvântul, procuror A.B. pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 7540/318/2010 al Judecătoriei Târgu-Jiu, formulată de petenta SC L. SA.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 octombrie 2012.