Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_213713 AI generated

Conflict between personal service and publication dates for appeal deadlines under specialized publication requirements

Case Number ICCJ_213713
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, in its Plenum for resolving legal issues, dismissed as inadmissible a reference submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the matter without a binding preliminary ruling. The dispute concerned a procedural conflict regarding the starting date for filing an appeal in a case subject to a special law requiring the publication of the judgment in a specialized legal periodical; specifically, whether the appeal period commences upon personal service of the judgment or upon its publication. The Court based its decision on the admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, rejecting the application without addressing the substantive interpretation of Article 43(2) of Law No. 85/2014.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 43 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 85/2014, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Conflict between personal service and publication dates for appeal deadlines under specialized publication requirements: The dispute concerned a procedural conflict regarding the starting date for filing an appeal in a case subject to a special law requiring the publication of the judgment in a specialized legal periodical; specifically, whether the appeal period commences upon personal service of the judgment or upon its publication. The Court based its decision on the admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, rejecting the application without addressing the substantive interpretation of Article 43(2) of Law No. 85/2014.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling matter in dispute periodical publications date of filing procedural issues article of civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 43 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 85/2014
În interpretarea art. 43 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the basis for the obligation of the decision in the dispositive order.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 9199/2009
Late filing of extraordinary appeal against limitation of free circulation under five-day statutory deadline
Decizia nr. 2613/2021
Inadmissibility of appeal against final revision decision due to statutory deadline breach and finality of judgment
Decizia nr. 49/2022
Admissibility of preliminary reference on modification of contravenction complaint after expiration of 15-day statutory deadline
Decizia nr. 2485/2022
Revision appeal inadmissible for lack of merits adjudication and barred by peremptory deadline for conflicting judgments
Decizia nr. 5311/2021
Contestatia în anulare pentru eroare materială privind calculul termenului de recurs și data comunicării sentinței

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the basis for the obligation of the decision in the dispositive order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 35 Dosar nr. 853/1/2024

Şedinţa din 17 iunie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a V-a Civilă în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea problemă de drept:

În interpretarea art. 43 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 85/2014, în situaţia în care partea primeşte personal comunicarea hotărârii, conform Codului de procedură civilă, anterior publicării acesteia în BPI, termenul de apel curge de la data primirii comunicării, potrivit Codului de procedură civilă, sau de la data publicării în BPI?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 iunie 2024.