Admissibility of appeal against insolvency liability judgment following definitive closure of procedure without appeal
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral filed by the Bacău Court of Appeal regarding the admissibility of an appeal against a judgment of financial liability for insolvency; consequently, the Court of Appeal’s request to clarify the procedural route under the insolvency law was rejected without substantive review. The dispute concerned whether an appeal was permissible against a decision imposing liability for the insolvent state of a company, specifically in scenarios where the insolvency procedure had already been closed definitively by non-appeal, raising issues of jurisdictional competence and procedural admissibility in commercial insolvency litigation. The decision rests on the mandatory provisions of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure and the scope of legal interpretation issues previously addressed in the Court’s 2022 decision on interest of law, specifically interpreting Articles 169, 174, and 180 of Law No. 85/2014 (Insolvency Law).
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 180 din Legea nr. 85/2014, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of appeal against insolvency liability judgment following definitive closure of procedure without appeal: The dispute concerned whether an appeal was permissible against a decision imposing liability for the insolvent state of a company, specifically in scenarios where the insolvency procedure had already been closed definitively by non-appeal, raising issues of jurisdictional competence and procedural admissibility in commercial insolvency litigation. The decision rests on the mandatory provisions of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure and the scope of legal interpretation issues previously addressed in the Court’s 2022 decision on interest of law, specifically interpreting Articles 169, 174, and 180 of Law No. 85/2014 (Insolvency Law).
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProcedural basis cited in the operative section to classify the court's decision as mandatory and binding regarding the resolution of the legal question.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 20 Dosar nr. 260/1/2024
Şedinţa din 22 aprilie 2024
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de apel Bacău – Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal în vederea lămuririi următoarei probleme de drept:
„în interpretarea dispozițiilor art. 169, art. 174, art. 180 din Legea nr. 85/2014, având în vedere dezlegările în decizia nr. 27/2022 pronunţată de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii, este admisibilă calea de atac a apelului împotriva sentinței de atragere a răspunderii patrimoniale pentru starea de insolvență, în ipoteza rămânerii definitive prin neapelare a închiderii procedurii?”.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în ședință publică astăzi, 22 aprilie 2024.