Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_212008 AI generated

Military pension service conditions and standard retirement age: reference question dismissed as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_212008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for the resolution of a legal question submitted by the Court of Appeal of Constanța in Civil Case No. 52/118/2023. The dispute concerned the interpretation of the Public Pensions System Law regarding whether beneficiaries with insurance periods accrued under special or severe conditions in the state military pension system are entitled to a reduction of the standard retirement age pursuant to specific statutory provisions. The Court’s decision rests on the procedural requirement of mandatory binding effect under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in the rejection of the request to issue a preliminary ruling on the interplay between Articles 55(2) and 192(1) of Law No. 263/2010.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 192 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Military pension service conditions and standard retirement age: reference question dismissed as inadmissible: 52/118/2023. The dispute concerned the interpretation of the Public Pensions System Law regarding whether beneficiaries with insurance periods accrued under special or severe conditions in the state military pension system are entitled to a reduction of the standard retirement age pursuant to specific statutory provisions. The Court’s decision rests on the procedural requirement of mandatory binding effect under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in the rejection of the request to issue a preliminary ruling on the interplay between Articles 55(2) and 192(1) of Law No. 263/2010.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory retirement age procedural requirement military service Civil Procedure Code reference for a preliminary ruling preliminary question

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 192 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010
(2) corelat cu art. 192 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to determine that the reference decision is obligatory, contributing to the admissibility analysis of the challenge.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to determine that the reference decision is obligatory, contributing to the admissibility analysis of the challenge.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 16 Dosar nr. 233/1/2024

Ședința din 8 aprilie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa – Secția I civilă, în Dosarul nr. 52/118/2023, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„În interpretarea art. 55 alin. (2) corelat cu art. 192 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările ulterioare, asiguraţii care au realizat stagii de cotizare în sistemul pensiilor militare de stat în condiţii speciale sau deosebite (sau grupa I sau II de muncă) beneficiază de reducerea vârstelor standard de pensionare in condiţiile art. 55 alin. (1) lit. a) şi b) din Legea nr 263/2010?”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 8 aprilie 2024.