Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_211730 AI generated

Referral on survivor’s pension recalculation held inadmissible; prior ruling binds.

Case Number ICCJ_211730
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Suceava Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether Articles 89(1)(a) and 89(2) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system exclude a survivor’s pension beneficiary’s right to request recalculation or revision of the deceased supporter’s pension rights to alter the survivor’s pension calculation base under Articles 113(1)(a) and 107 of the same law; the dismissal leaves the lower court’s underlying question unresolved and binds according to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, with no new ruling on the merits prevailing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Referral on survivor’s pension recalculation held inadmissible; prior ruling binds: 263/2010 on the unified public pension system exclude a survivor’s pension beneficiary’s right to request recalculation or revision of the deceased supporter’s pension rights to alter the survivor’s pension calculation base under Articles 113(1)(a) and 107 of the same law; the dismissal leaves the lower court’s underlying question unresolved and binds according to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, with no new ruling on the merits prevailing.

Keywords

AI generated
recalculation of pension survivor's pension effects of a preliminary ruling Civil Procedure Code preliminary ruling procedure social insurance proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Defines the binding effect of the decision (obligatorie) in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 6/2024
Survivor’s pension recalculation referral inadmissible for lack of genuine interpretive difficulty
Decizia nr. 84/2017
Pension recalc referral inadmissible: prior binding rulings on contribution basis left intact
ICCJ_220714
Service pension recalculation referral held inadmissible for lacking statutory preconditions
Decizia nr. 11/2024
Survivor's pension claim referral dismissed as inadmissible; statutory interpretation left to trial court.
Decizia nr. 81/2018
Referral on pension recalculation contribution periods dismissed as inadmissible due to prior binding ruling.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Defines the binding effect of the decision (obligatorie) in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 6 Dosar nr. 2847/1/2023

Ședința din 5 februarie 2024

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Suceava – Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 3182/86/2022, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă prevederile art. 89 alin. (1) lit. a) şi alin. (2) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, exclud existenţa dreptului beneficiarului pensiei de urmaş de a solicita recalcularea sau revizuirea drepturilor de pensie ale susţinătorului defunct pentru a modifica baza de calcul pentru pensia de urmaş, prin raportare la dispoziţiile art. 113 alin. (1) lit. a) şi art. 107 din aceeaşi lege.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 5 februarie 2024.